Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

FC-SWE trains coding agents on recovery after failed patches

Original title: FC-SWE: Failure-Conditioned RL for Long-Horizon Software Engineering Agents

Hugging Face daily papersby Jia Liufu, Bin Hu, Linglin Jing ()1 min read1 · 1 read
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

With Qwen3.5-4B and SWE-agent it reports 41.7% Resolved@1 versus 38.9% for GRPO.

FC-SWE is a failure-conditioned reinforcement learning method for long-horizon software engineering agents. After verification fails, it restores the repository and conditions a recovery trajectory on the failed patch and verifier feedback. On all 500 SWE-bench Verified tasks under a verifier-assisted protocol, the authors report higher resolve rates than GRPO.

Unconfirmed: Scores are author-reported under a verifier-assisted protocol; independent replication is not stated.

Key facts
  • Resolved@2 is 52.8% for FC-SWE versus 48.5% for GRPO.
  • Training uses at most two attempts per chain.
  • At an eleven-attempt test budget, Resolved@11 is 70.7%.
  • Trajectory-local rewards keep recovery success from crediting a failed patch.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at huggingface.co

Repository-level software engineering (SWE) is a challenging long-horizon setting: agents must reason over extended interactions, use tools, and adapt to stateful environments.

Hugging Face daily papers

By Jia Liufu, Bin Hu, Linglin Jing · huggingface.co

Read the full article at Hugging Face daily papers

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.