Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Quantum hardness separation extends Bennett-Gill question

Original title: Structured Quantum Hardness from Unstructured Assumptions

arXiv cs.CRby Xiao Liang ()1 min read
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Conditional oracle separation shows structured quantum hardness can arise from unstructured assumptions.

The paper proves if UP is not contained in BQP then NP^O intersect coNP^O is not contained in BQP^O with probability 1 over random oracle. This extends classical results to quantum settings. It also rules out black-box reductions for worst-case quantum hardness.

Unconfirmed: Conditional on UP notsubseteq BQP

Key facts
  • Conditional separation under random oracle O
  • Rules out black-box reductions to iO and OWF
  • Evidence for non-black-box techniques needed
  • Extends Bennett-Gill question to quantum
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Whether useful structured hardness can arise from unstructured assumptions is a fundamental question in complexity and cryptography. The longstanding Bennett-Gill question asks whether $\mathsf{NP}\cap\mathsf{coNP}$ remains hard relative to a random oracle; [GIKKLS, STOC 2023] recently gave a conditional affirmative answer in the classical setting.

arXiv cs.CR

By Xiao Liang · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.CR

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.