Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Interlock synthesizes completion graphs to train long-horizon agents

Original title: Interlock: From Local Correctness to Task Completion in Long-Horizon Agents

Hugging Face daily papersby Linji Hao, Yanji He, Zihan Wang ()1 min read1 · 1 read
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Fine-tuning two Qwen3.6 backbones on accepted trajectories lifts AutomationBench pass rates by 4.00-4.50 points.

Interlock represents long-horizon tasks as typed completion graphs linking evidence, decisions, and required effects, then compiles them into a workspace, request, and rubric. Reviews and an agent-as-judge keep trajectories that meet mandatory requirements. The authors fine-tune two Qwen3.6 backbones on accepted trajectories and report gains on three external benchmarks.

Unconfirmed: Training gains are author-reported, not independently confirmed.

Key facts
  • AutomationBench pass rates rise 4.00-4.50 percentage points.
  • JobBench weighted scores rise 3.20-6.64 points.
  • Harvey LAB criterion pass rates rise 3.89-4.16 percentage points.
  • Each backbone is trained on its own accepted trajectories.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at huggingface.co

Large language model agents increasingly undertake long-horizon tasks in complex environments characterized by fragmented evidence, partially completed states, and dependencies across resources and artifacts. Existing agents may satisfy individual requirements while failing to maintain these relationships, producing locally correct but incomplete outcomes.

Hugging Face daily papers

By Linji Hao, Yanji He, Zihan Wang · huggingface.co

Read the full article at Hugging Face daily papers

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.