Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Improving email security outcomes with real-world Microsoft Defender insights

Microsoft Security Blogby Rob Lefferts ()4 min read1 · 1 read
AI summary · glm-5.3-flashSummaries by Vani AI

Microsoft's quarterly benchmark claims Defender missed 55.4% fewer high-severity email threats than the next-closest secure email gateway.

Microsoft published its fifth consecutive quarterly email security benchmark covering May through July 2026, reporting Defender missed 221 high-severity threats per 1,000 protected users, 55.4% fewer than the next-closest SEG vendor, and caught 92% of post-delivery malicious messages. Microsoft notes missed threats are rising across vendors as AI helps attackers craft more convincing impersonation attempts. The report also highlights product updates, including a redesigned AI model stack that reduced false negatives by roughly two-thirds and new prompt injection protection for Copilot and other AI systems that process email.

Key facts
  • Defender missed 221 high-severity threats per 1,000 users versus the next-closest SEG
  • Caught 92% of post-delivery malicious messages during the May-July 2026 benchmark
  • Missed threats are increasing as AI enables more convincing attacker impersonation
  • New prompt injection protection aims to shield Copilot and agents from malicious email instructions
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

4 min read at microsoft.com

The latest email security benchmarking reports show strong Microsoft Defender performance across pre-delivery and post-delivery scenarios and reveal where threats and defenses continue to evolve. The post Improving email security outcomes with real-world Microsoft Defender insights appeared first on Microsoft Security Blog.

Microsoft Security Blog

By Rob Lefferts · microsoft.com

Read the full article at Microsoft Security Blog

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.