Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Differential Trust: Dynamic Multi-Authority Anonymous Credentials with Epoch-Weighted Updates

arXiv cs.CRby Chen Li ()1 min read6 · 4 reads
AI summary · glm-5.3-flashSummaries by Vani AI

Researchers propose MA-ACEW, the first multi-authority anonymous credential model with epoch-weighted issuance and efficient cross-epoch credential updates.

The paper introduces MA-ACEW, a multi-authority anonymous credential scheme that weights authorities differently during credential issuance, targeting decentralized systems such as Proof-of-Stake networks. Its core primitive, Epoch-Bound Pointcheval-Sanders Signatures (EB-PS), binds signatures to time epochs, enabling non-interactive credential updates when authority weight distributions change. The authors formalize EUF-eCMA unforgeability and prove unforgeability, anonymity, and blindness under a novel STB-GPS assumption. Aggregating a credential from 128 partial credentials takes about 10.68 ms on average.

Key facts
  • First multi-authority anonymous credential model incorporating authority weight distribution
  • Epoch-Bound Pointcheval-Sanders signatures enable non-interactive updates across epochs
  • Unforgeability, anonymity, and blindness proven under novel STB-GPS assumption
  • Aggregating 128 partial credentials takes only 10.68 ms on average
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Anonymous credentials (ACs) are fundamental to privacy-preserving authentication, allowing users to prove possession of attributes without revealing their identities. State-of-the-art ACs distribute credential issuance across multiple authorities, typically employing techniques such as Shamir's secret sharing or aggregate signatures.

arXiv cs.CR

By Chen Li · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.CR

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.