ZeroHour
Security Affairspublished ()ingested Pierluigi Paganini1

UK Council Attack Linked to Mass Exploitation of SonicWall Flaw

criticalExploit / PoC exploited in the wildimportance 90CVE-2026-15409
AI summary · glm-5.3-flash

Hunt.io links a UK council attack to mass exploitation of SonicWall SMA1000 flaw CVE-2026-15409 (CVSS 10.0), enabling credential and Active Directory theft.

Hunt.io links, with moderate confidence, the July 17, 2026 attack on the Borough Council of King's Lynn and West Norfolk to mass exploitation of SonicWall SMA1000 appliances via CVE-2026-15409, an unauthenticated SSRF in the WorkPlace portal WebSocket proxy with CVSS 10.0. The operator adapted Rapid7's July 15 PoC into a 50-thread mass scanner within days and stole LDAP credentials for 534 Active Directory accounts across 160 domains, with nine environments losing SAM/LSA secrets and five losing full AD databases via DCSync. CISA added the flaw to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog and noted use in ransomware campaigns; targeting of ~200,000 Shodan-derived SonicWall addresses spanned government, healthcare, finance, universities, and manufacturing worldwide.

  • CVE-2026-15409 is an unauthenticated SSRF in the WorkPlace portal WebSocket proxy, CVSS 10.0.
  • Active exploitation was observed before SonicWall's July 14 advisory; mass scanning followed within days.
  • Operator deployed a standalone Linux Impacket secretsdump on appliances to evade EDR and SIEM visibility.
  • A fixed AES key in ASAPPasswordUtil decrypts LDAP credentials on every vulnerable SMA1000 device.
  • LSA secrets of domain controller machine accounts enabled pass-the-hash DCSync in five environments.

Vulnerabilities mentionedAll →

CVEVulnerabilityCVSSEPSSFlagsAffectedExposurePublished
CVE-2026-15409
Unauthenticated SSRF in SonicWall SMA1000 Appliances

CVE-2026-15409 is a server-side request forgery (SSRF, CWE-918) in the Appliance Work Place interface of SonicWall SMA1000 series appliances. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can trigger the flaw over the network, causing the appliance to issue requests to attacker-influenced or unintended internal locations. Because the CVSS vector scores scope-changed impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, the SSRF is assessed as capable of reaching sensitive internal services, and reporting indicates it is being used alongside a second SMA1000 zero-day in what may be an exploitation chain. Affected organizations are those running SMA1000 appliances, including SMA 6210, SMA 7210, and SMA 8200v models, which typically act as internet-facing remote-access/VPN gateways. Exploitation is confirmed in the wild: the flaw was added to CISA's KEV on 2026-07-14, ransomware use is known, and EPSS assigns an 83.7% probability of exploitation within 30 days, though no public PoC is available.

Do: Apply SonicWall's SMA1000 firmware update per the vendor's instructions immediately, prioritizing appliances with the Appliance Work Place interface reachable from the internet. Because the flaw is in CISA's KEV with known ransomware use and may be chained with a second SMA1000 zero-day, hunt for signs of compromise (unexpected outbound or internal requests, anomalous VPN sessions, follow-on ransomware activity) and restrict internet exposure of the interface in the interim. Federal and critical-infrastructure operators must comply with CISA BOD 26-04, including cloud-service guidance, or discontinue use if mitigations are unavailable.

10.085% KEV ransomware
  • SonicWall SMA1000 Appliances (SMA 6210 firmware)
  • SonicWall SMA1000 Appliances (SMA 7210 firmware)
  • SonicWall SMA1000 Appliances (SMA 8200v)
largeon the order of tens of thousands of internet-exposed appliances (estimate)

Indicators of compromiseAll →

TypeIndicatorContext
domainhunt.ioe automated campaigns was effectively less than three days. Hunt.io’s AttackCapture system crawled the attacker’s open director
sha256690f5031deede7d3357d0ca24c89866ae8c60e6c63b3a2c8bba813a6ac10ae5bts. The SHA-256 of the Impacket binary the operator used is 690f5031deede7d3357d0ca24c89866ae8c60e6c63b3a2c8bba813a6ac10ae5b , and the delivery IP was 95.181.173[.]36. The operator ran
Full article1,163 words · extracted from securityaffairs.com · click to collapse

Pierluigi Paganini September 11, 2026

A critical SonicWall flaw was rapidly weaponized, with a UK Council attack linked to a campaign that exposed credentials and enabled Active Directory theft.

On July 17, 2026, the Borough Council of King’s Lynn and West Norfolk announced it had detected a cyberattack affecting council services. Hunt.io has since published a detailed technical analysis linking that incident, with moderate confidence, to a wider mass-exploitation campaign against SonicWall SMA1000 appliances using CVE-2026-15409, a maximum-severity SSRF flaw that received a CVSS score of 10.0.

CVE-2026-15409 affects the WorkPlace portal’s WebSocket proxy. An attacker does not need to log in. By sending a specially crafted request to /wsproxy, they can make the appliance connect to port 1050 on its own local system, where a CouchDB-related Erlang service is running.

The attacker can then use a hardcoded cookie found in the appliance firmware to complete the Erlang connection and access the [email protected] node. From there, they can send commands that execute operating system commands with the privileges of the couchdb account.

The attack may sound complicated, but once automated, an attacker can complete all the steps in just a few seconds.

“Across the wider campaign, compromised appliances were used as footholds into internal networks. The operator deployed a standalone Linux build of Impacket’s secretsdump directly onto selected SonicWall appliances, enabling remote credential theft from internal Windows systems.” reads the report published by Hunt.io. “This approach could help the actor evade detection, as organisations typically have substantially less visibility into the underlying operating systems of firewall and VPN appliances than into managed Windows and Linux hosts monitored by EDR.”

Rapid7 researchers published a proof-of-concept on July 15. The operator had adapted it into a 50-thread mass scanner by July 16. Rapid7’s own Managed Detection and Response team had already observed active exploitation of the vulnerability before SonicWall’s July 14 advisory, meaning the gap between zero-day exploitation and mass-scale automated campaigns was effectively less than three days.

Hunt.io’s AttackCapture system crawled the attacker’s open directory at 95.181.173[.]36 on July 17, the same day the council announced its incident. That directory contained the operator’s complete toolchain: scan scripts, exploit code, credential-parsing utilities, a standalone Impacket binary, and the output files from the ongoing campaign.

The campaign data covered 250 target appliances. Of those, 168 exposed LDAP configuration files containing credentials for 534 Active Directory accounts across 160 domain names and 255 internal LDAP server addresses. Nine of those environments lost SAM and LSA secrets to the operator. Five lost their entire Active Directory database through full DCSync replication, targeting seven domain controllers in total.

After gaining access, the attackers follow a clear process. Their ldap_extract.py script reads /usr/local/extranet/etc/policy_file.xml from each compromised appliance and decrypts the LDAP passwords stored in the file.

The decryption uses a fixed 32-byte AES key embedded in the ASAPPasswordUtil.class code. This means the same key can work on every SonicWall SMA1000 device running vulnerable firmware.

Once they obtain valid LDAP credentials, the attackers download a standalone Linux version of Impacket’s secretsdump to /tmp/secretsdump from their server using curl. They then use the SonicWall appliance’s network access to run the tool against internal Windows systems and extract credentials and other sensitive information.

A SonicWall VPN appliance running secretsdump against internal domain controllers doesn’t trigger EDR alerts on Windows endpoints, doesn’t appear in Windows event logs as a rogue process, and doesn’t show up in most SIEM rules tuned for managed hosts. The appliance is doing exactly what it’s supposed to do: connecting to internal systems. The malicious traffic blends into legitimate network behaviour.

When the LDAP credentials did not have enough privileges to perform DCSync, the attackers used LSA secrets recovered with secretsdump. These secrets can contain the NTLM hash of a domain controller’s machine account. Because domain controllers normally have directory replication rights, the attackers could use these hashes to perform DCSync.

Their scripts searched the secretsdump output for account names ending in $, extracted the related hashes, and used them to launch pass-the-hash DCSync requests through the compromised SonicWall appliance.

The technique worked in five environments. The attackers used the SonicWall appliance to create NTDS database files in /tmp and then retrieved them by exploiting CVE-2026-15409 to execute commands on the device.

“The appliances associated with confirmed SAM and LSA theft were distributed across infrastructure in France, India, Italy and the United States.” Hunt.io states. “The wider target inventory was considerably broader, containing named gateways associated with organisations in the United Kingdom, Canada, Germany, Sweden, Poland, Hungary, South Korea and Hong Kong, among other locations.”

The sectors covered included local government and law enforcement, healthcare, financial services, universities, manufacturing, and managed IT providers. The targeting was opportunistic: the operator selected organizations because they ran a vulnerable SonicWall appliance, not because of what sector they were in. That’s consistent with the Shodan-derived target lists recovered from the directory, which contained nearly 200,000 addresses labelled as SonicWall systems.

The scripts contained extensive Chinese-language comments, but Hunt.io assessed this as insufficient for attribution. CISA added CVE-2026-15409 to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog and noted it had been used in ransomware campaigns. A separate threat actor tracked as UTA0533 used the same vulnerability to deploy KNUCKLEBALL malware, and the ransomware group INC has also exploited the vulnerability chain. Multiple actors using the same CVSS-10 flaw in parallel is now the normal pattern for critical VPN and access device vulnerabilities, not an anomaly.

For SonicWall SMA1000 operators who haven’t patched: the fixed firmware versions are 12.4.3-03453 and later. Patching alone isn’t sufficient if exploitation has already occurred. SonicWall recommends re-imaging affected appliances, rotating all user and administrator credentials, and resetting TOTP tokens. The Hunt.io report includes specific log locations and indicators of compromise for assessments. The SHA-256 of the Impacket binary the operator used is 690f5031deede7d3357d0ca24c89866ae8c60e6c63b3a2c8bba813a6ac10ae5b, and the delivery IP was 95.181.173[.]36.

The operator ran their entire post-exploitation framework from an open HTTP server on port 80 without authentication. The exploitation was technically capable. The operational security was not. Hunt.io captured the whole operation while it was still running.

“The retained evidence shows how quickly public vulnerability research can be operationalised. By 16 July 2026, two days after SonicWall disclosed CVE-2026-15409, a threat actor was using modified, multithreaded tooling to identify vulnerable SMA 1000 appliances, extract and decrypt LDAP credentials, and automate follow-on credential theft against internal Active Directory environments.” concludes the report. “Deploying a standalone Linux build of Impacket directly to compromised edge appliances made the operation both scalable and evasive. Most organisations have substantially less process, file and network visibility into the underlying operating systems of security appliances than they have through EDR on managed Windows and Linux hosts. This visibility gap allowed the SonicWall appliances to function as internal attack platforms from which the operator collected SAM and LSA secrets and, in five AD domains, performed full DCSync replication.”

Follow me on Twitter: @securityaffairs and Facebook and Mastodon

Pierluigi Paganini

(SecurityAffairs – hacking, SonicWall)



Text extracted automatically; images, tables and formatting may be missing. Original: https://securityaffairs.com/198864/hacking/uk-council-attack-linked-to-mass-exploitation-of-sonicwall-flaw.html