The Visibility Gap in Phishing Detection: Where Sandboxing Makes a Difference
ANY.RUN promotes sandboxing for multi-stage phishing and cites sharp growth in 2026 evasion techniques.
ANY.RUN argues that phishing often reveals credential pages only after JavaScript, redirects, fingerprinting, or fake CAPTCHAs, so static URL inspection leaves a visibility gap. Its H1 2026 Cyber Risk Report cites a 437% rise in custom fake CAPTCHAs from Q1 to Q2 2026, a 90.7% increase in attacks involving Adobe infrastructure from H2 2025 to H1 2026, and a 26.5% rise in RMM-related attacks. The article promotes detonating suspicious URLs in ANY.RUN’s Interactive Sandbox rather than reporting a specific incident.
- Static URL checks can miss post-load phishing behavior
- Fake CAPTCHA use reportedly rose 437% from Q1 to Q2 2026
- Adobe-infrastructure attacks up 90.7%; RMM attacks up 26.5%
- Piece promotes ANY.RUN Interactive Sandbox for investigations
- Vendors
- ANY.RUN
- Products
- ANY.RUN Interactive Sandbox
From the original article
8 min read at cybersecuritynews.com
The difficult part of phishing detection for a security team often begins after the initial alert. A suspicious URL may look clean at first glance, leaving the analyst with a familiar question: Is this a false positive, or is there something hidden behind the link? Attackers are increasingly building phishing campaigns that change what happens […]
By Balaji N · cybersecuritynews.com
A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.