The TTPs of Conti's initial access broker
Vulnerabilities mentionedAll →
| CVE | Vulnerability | CVSS | EPSS | Flags | Affected | Exposure | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-40444 | Remote Code Execution via MSHTML Rendering Engine in Microsoft Windows/Office (CVE-2021-40444) CVE-2021-40444 is a remote code execution vulnerability in the Microsoft MSHTML browser rendering engine, which Microsoft Office documents can load on Windows systems. It is triggered when a user is convinced to open a specially crafted Office document containing a malicious ActiveX control hosted by the MSHTML engine (tracked as a path-traversal-class issue, CWE-22). A successful attacker gains the ability to run arbitrary code in the context of the logged-on user, with greater impact when that user has administrative rights. Any Windows system that can open Office documents is exposed, spanning Windows 7, 8.1, RT 8.1, Windows 10 (1507 through 21H1) and Windows Server 2004/2008. Exploitation is confirmed in the wild: Microsoft observed targeted attacks at disclosure, the flaw is in CISA's KEV with known ransomware use, and Microsoft released security updates on September 14, 2021. Do: Apply Microsoft's security updates released September 14, 2021 for your Windows version immediately; this is a CISA KEV item with known ransomware use, so patching is treated as mandatory. As interim protection, keep Microsoft Defender Antivirus/Defender for Endpoint signatures current (enterprise detection build 1.349.22.0 or newer, with alerts appearing as 'Suspicious Cpl File Execution') and avoid opening untrusted Office documents, since exploitation requires user interaction with a crafted file. | 8.8 | 97% | KEV ransomware PoC ×2 |
| masshundreds of millions of Windows PCs and servers (nearly all Windows desktop/laptop installs on affected versions at disclosure) |
Indicators of compromiseauto-extracted · verify before use · export allAll →
| Type | Indicator | Context |
|---|---|---|
| domain | company.com | nization – e.g., company.us (or .co , .biz , etc.) to spoof company.com . Next they create an email account purportedly belonging t |
| domain | company.us | in that looks like that of an existing organization – e.g., company.us (or .co , .biz , etc.) to spoof company.com . Next they cre |
| [email protected] | count purportedly belonging to an employee of the company ( [email protected] ), and use that email to contact an employee at the target |
Full article560 words · extracted from helpnetsecurity.com · click to collapse
Automation might be the way to go for many things, but a recently published report by Google’s Threat Analysis Group (TAG) shows why targeted phishing campaigns performed by human operators are often successful, and how the Conti ransomware gang excels at targeting organizations with the help of an initial access broker.
Exotic Lily: A threat actor specializing in gaining initial access into organizations
TAG researchers Vlad Stolyarov and Benoit Sevens have delineated the tactics, techniques and procedures (TTPs) used by an initial access broker (IAB) they dubbed Exotic Lily.
Their (very consistent) modus operandi starts with registering a domain that looks like that of an existing organization – e.g., company.us (or .co, .biz, etc.) to spoof company.com.

Next they create an email account purportedly belonging to an employee of the company ([email protected]), and use that email to contact an employee at the target organization.
“Using spoofed email accounts, attackers would then send spear phishing emails under the pretext of a business proposal, such as seeking to outsource a software development project or an information security service,” TAG analysts explained.
After a few exchanged emails discussing business, they would upload a malicious payload to a public file-sharing service such as TransferNow, TransferXL, WeTransfer or OneDrive, and use the service’s built-in email notification feature to share the file with the target.

It’s easy to see why this approach is so successful:
- Most employees are busy and many will not notice that emails are sent from spoofed domains (as they look very much like the real thing)
- Customized phishing emails created by humans are more credible and inspire more trust than those based on templates, sent automatically based on detected keywords in the sender’s reply
- Emails sent by legitimate services with links to malicious payloads hosted at legitimate services are less likely be detected and flagged as malicious by email security defenses
Once the targets download and run the malicious loaders or backdoors posing as innocuous documents, the malware collects and sends system information to a C2 server and waits for instructions to execute shellcode and drop and run executable files (most recently: Cobalt Strike payloads).
Connection with Conti and Diavol
“Although the group came to our attention initially due to its use of documents containing an exploit for CVE-2021-40444, they later switched to the delivery of ISO files with hidden BazarLoader DLLs and LNK shortcuts. These samples have some indicators that suggest they were custom-built to be used by the group,” the analysts shared.
These and other indicators point to a connection between this initial access broker and threat actors pushing the human-operated Conti and Diavol ransomware, though the analysts believe they are specialized, separate entities.
“A breakdown of the actor’s communication activity shows the operators are working a fairly typical 9-to-5 job, with very little activity during the weekends. Distribution of the actor’s working hours suggest they might be working from a Central or an Eastern Europe timezone,” the analysts noted.
“At the peak of EXOTIC LILY’s activity, we estimate they were sending more than 5,000 emails a day, to as many as 650 targeted organizations globally. Up until November 2021, the group seemed to be targeting specific industries such as IT, cybersecurity and healthcare, but as of late we have seen them attacking a wide variety of organizations and industries, with less specific focus.”
Text extracted automatically; images, tables and formatting may be missing. Original: https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2022/03/18/conti-initial-access/