Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Jev-Mem: System-One-Controlled Agentic Memory for Efficient AI Agents

Hugging Face daily papersby Dongming Jiang, Yi Li, Bingzhe Li ()1 min read1 · 1 read
AI summary · grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Jev-Mem uses a fast System-One controller for agent memory, beating baselines on LoCoMo while cutting latency.

Researchers introduce Jev-Mem, an agentic memory system that separates fast memory control from slower reasoning. A System-One controller manages memory typing, query routing, retrieval budgets, graph traversal, scoring, and stopping, while System Two is reserved for complex reasoning and answer synthesis. On LoCoMo it scores 0.777 under LLM-as-a-Judge, an 11 percent relative gain over the strongest baseline. Memory construction takes 158 seconds, 6.6 times faster than the fastest competitor, and average query latency is 0.93 seconds, down 36.7 percent.

Key facts
  • System-One plane controls construction and retrieval; System Two handles hard reasoning.
  • LoCoMo LLM-as-a-Judge score is 0.777, up 11 percent versus the best baseline.
  • Memory construction takes 158 seconds, a 6.6-times speedup over the fastest rival.
  • Average query latency falls to 0.93 seconds, a 36.7 percent reduction.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at huggingface.co

Agentic memory is becoming essential for long-horizon AI agents, yet many existing systems rely on autoregressive LLMs to control how memories are organized, retrieved, and used, placing expensive generation on the critical path of memory operations. We introduce \method, a new agentic memory architecture inspired by System-One/System-Two cognition.

Hugging Face daily papers

By Dongming Jiang, Yi Li, Bingzhe Li · huggingface.co

Read the full article at Hugging Face daily papers

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.