Grow the Harness, Not the Context: From Strategy-Free Scaffolds to Reusable Specialist Agents
Growing Harness converts recurring agent control into reusable code, cutting LLM calls by 76 to 92 percent.
Growing Harness is a failure-guided method that starts from a strategy-free scaffold and accumulates accepted code edits into one shared agent harness, moving recurring control out of the model context. Across BrowseComp-Plus and WebArena-Verified with deployment models from 4B to 120B parameters, it posted the highest mean success in five of six settings and trailed the best mean by 0.7 percentage points in the sixth. Relative to a tool-calling agent, it cut LLM calls by 76.0-91.8% and inference cost by 74.4-98.6%. On WebArena-Verified, success held at 44.7-45.3% across scales, while tool-calling fell to 6.7% with the 4B model.
- Failure-guided edits grow one shared harness from a strategy-free scaffold.
- Highest mean success in five of six BrowseComp-Plus and WebArena settings.
- LLM calls drop 76.0-91.8% and inference cost 74.4-98.6% versus tool-calling.
- WebArena success stays 44.7-45.3% even with a 4B deployment model.
Full article244 words · extracted from arxiv.org · click to collapse
Large language model (LLM) agents often handle streams of related tasks, yet standard harnesses repeatedly ask the model to reconstruct the same control decisions inside each task's context. We study whether task feedback can instead turn recurring control into reusable executable code, while reserving LLM calls for task-specific semantic reasoning. We introduce Growing Harness, a failure-guided training paradigm that learns the agent harness itself from a strategy-free scaffold that exposes fixed model and tool interfaces but encodes no task-solving controller. Function-level execution traces localize each failure to a bounded code surface, an optimizer repairs a window of failures jointly, and a success-first held-out gate rolls back repair sequences that harm prior capability. Accepted edits accumulate in one shared harness, allowing its control structure to emerge from task feedback. Across BrowseComp-Plus and WebArena-Verified with three deployment models from 4B to 120B parameters, Growing Harness achieves the highest mean success in five of six benchmark-model settings and trails the best mean by 0.7 pp. in the sixth. Relative to a Tool-Calling agent, it reduces LLM calls by 76.0-91.8% and deployed-agent inference cost by 74.4-98.6%. On WebArena-Verified, its success remains 44.7-45.3% across model scales, whereas Tool-Calling falls to 6.7% with the 4B model. Ablations show that trace-local edits, joint repair, and gate-based rollback each improve final success. These results show that persistent program growth can move recurring control out of model context and into low-cost code, yielding reusable specialist agents that remain effective with smaller deployment models.
Text extracted automatically; images, tables and formatting may be missing. Original: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.26760