Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

HQL balances one-step and multi-step returns for long horizons

Original title: Horizon-Scalable Q-Learning

Hugging Face daily papersby Haoran Xu, Pragya Srivastava, Xinjie Liu ()1 min read
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

A multi-step target is kept only when a dataset action beats best-of-N behavior-cloned actions.

Horizon-Scalable Q-Learning targets error accumulation in offline Q-learning as task horizons grow. One-step temporal-difference learning compounds per-step errors, while fixed multi-step returns add bias from suboptimal dataset actions. HQL extends a target through a dataset action only when the critic values it at least as highly as the best of N actions from the behavior-cloning policy; otherwise it uses a one-step target. The authors say the rule needs no action densities, works with flow and diffusion policies, and outperforms prior methods on long-horizon OGBench and OCBench tasks.

Unconfirmed: Task gains are reported by the authors and are not independently verified.

Key facts
  • The method does not require action density estimates.
  • It is compatible with flow and diffusion policies.
  • Authors report results on combination-lock, OGBench, and OCBench.
  • No fixed multi-step length is applied to a whole trajectory.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at huggingface.co

Learning accurate off-policy state-action value functions (Q-functions) from offline datasets becomes harder as the task horizon grows. One-step temporal-difference (TD) learning bootstraps after every transition, so small per-step errors accumulate along the horizon, and early states can be badly misvalued even when the TD loss is small.

Hugging Face daily papers

By Haoran Xu, Pragya Srivastava, Xinjie Liu · huggingface.co

Read the full article at Hugging Face daily papers

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.