Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

LENS: The Sum Is Worse Than the Parts for Set-Level Poisoning in Retrieval-Augmented Generation

arXiv cs.CRby Kaisheng Fan ()1 min read3 · 2 reads
AI summary · grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

LENS poisons RAG by composing document sets whose attack succeeds only when the full set is retrieved.

LENS is a black-box multi-agent method for set-level compositional poisoning of retrieval-augmented generation. Individually plausible documents jointly steer a frozen RAG system to a target answer, while every proper subset fails to do so alone. Across four benchmarks and three generators, returned packets reach 0.852 full-set attack success and 0.784 post-retrieval ASR@5, versus 0.069 for the strongest proper subset. Against the same frozen manifest, LENS raises all-attempt E2E-Strict@5 from 0.244 to 0.363 and remains ahead of four published defenses by 0.141 average defended ASR@5.

Key facts
  • LENS composes document sets that redirect RAG only when the full set is used.
  • Every proper subset is designed to remain insufficient to induce the target answer.
  • Full-set ASR is 0.852 and post-retrieval ASR@5 is 0.784 across four benchmarks.
  • The strongest proper subsets reach only 0.069 attack success.
  • LENS leads four published defenses by 0.141 average defended ASR@5.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) aggregates evidence from multiple external documents, yet this joint integration creates an underexamined vulnerability: attack effects absent in individual documents can emerge through set-level composition. Existing coordinated attacks do not explicitly enforce that every proper subset remains insufficient in frozen single-round RAG.

arXiv cs.CR

By Kaisheng Fan · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.CR

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.