Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

China Calls Amodei’s AI Proposal a New Cold War Playbook

Security Affairsby Pierluigi Paganini ()5 min read2 · 1 read
AI summary · glm-5.3Summaries by Vani AI

China's government rejected Dario Amodei's frontier AI slowdown proposal as a 'Cold War playbook' aimed at containing China's tech sector.

China's Foreign Ministry and state-backed Global Times attacked Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei's 'We Must Pace the Frontier' essay, calling it fearmongering and US containment strategy. Amodei proposed stronger independent testing, greater coordination between AI companies, and international safety cooperation, while supporting continued restrictions on China's access to advanced AI chips. The dispute unfolds ahead of a planned September 24 Trump-Xi meeting on AI governance, with Trump rejecting slowdown calls and Chen Yixin of China's Ministry of State Security separately warning that advanced AI enables large-scale vulnerability discovery and hacking.

Key facts
  • Amodei proposes slowing frontier capability gains so safety oversight can catch up
  • Beijing calls the proposal a 'Cold War playbook' of technology containment
  • Anthropic offers independent evaluators permanent access to its systems
  • Trump rejected slowdown, insisting the US must keep its AI lead
  • Trump-Xi AI governance meeting planned for September 24
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

5 min read at securityaffairs.com

China rejects Amodei’s AI slowdown proposal, calling it fearmongering and a US attempt to contain China’s technology sector. The debate over whether the world should slow down the development of advanced AI has quickly turned into something bigger than a technology argument. Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, has called for a slower pace of development, […]

Security Affairs

By Pierluigi Paganini · securityaffairs.com

Read the full article at Security Affairs

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.