Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Convergent Emergence of In-Context Learning Across Modalities

Hugging Face daily papersby Nathan Breslow, Seungwook Han, Daniel Hyunsoo Lee ()1 min read2 · 1 read
AI summary · glm-5.3-flashSummaries by Vani AI

Controlled experiments show few-shot in-context learning emerges across six modalities including language, genomes, images, and proteins, partially supporting a convergence hypothesis.

The paper tests the Convergent Emergence Hypothesis: that few-shot in-context learning, when it emerges, shares a common cross-modality difficulty profile. A controlled framework instantiated the same task suite across six modalities: language, genome, integer sequences, time series, images, and proteins. Paired-mapping ICL emerged in all six modalities, surpassed controlled baselines, and showed correlated per-task effects in five of them, providing partial support for the hypothesis.

Key facts
  • Same few-shot ICL task suite instantiated in six modalities for controlled comparison
  • Paired-mapping ICL emerged in all six modalities and beat controlled baselines
  • Per-task difficulty effects correlated across five of six modalities
  • Extends prior ICL findings from language models to autoregressive genomic models
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at huggingface.co

Few-shot in-context learning (ICL), the capacity of a model to infer abstract patterns from input-output examples provided in its prompt and apply them to new inputs, has been extensively studied in large language models trained for next-token prediction on human text. Recently, few-shot ICL has been demonstrated in autoregressive genomic models as well.

Hugging Face daily papers

By Nathan Breslow, Seungwook Han, Daniel Hyunsoo Lee · huggingface.co

Read the full article at Hugging Face daily papers

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.