Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Hackers Advertise Uncensored Luciferus AI Service on Underground Forums

Cyber Security Newsby Guru Baran ()2 min read1 · 1 read
AI summary · glm-5.3Summaries by Vani AI

Sophos CTU found Luciferus, an uncensored criminal AI subscription service on the Exploit forum that returned RAT source code on request.

Sophos Counter Threat Unit discovered Luciferus advertised on August 24, 2026 on the Exploit forum by persona 'Optimus_Prime', claiming a proprietary 120-billion-parameter uncensored model that analysts assess with low confidence may be built on Alibaba's Qwen. Subscriptions run $35-$75 monthly, with a VIP 'Individual Embodiment' tier offering a separately deployed model trained on customer data. In testing, the Junior model generated Python remote-access-trojan source code, though Sophos did not execute or verify it. The service extends the WormGPT/FraudGPT lineage into structured commercialization with tiered pricing resembling mature SaaS businesses.

Key facts
  • Claims a proprietary 120B-parameter model; low-confidence assessment it is Qwen-based
  • Tiers: $35 Inquisitor, $55 Archdeviel, $75 Prince of Darkness; VIP custom-deployed model
  • Junior tier generated Python RAT code on request; functionality unverified
  • Follows WormGPT/FraudGPT lineage; criminal AI services now resemble mature software businesses
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

2 min read at cybersecuritynews.com

Hackers are advertising a new “uncensored” artificial intelligence service called Luciferus, positioning it as a subscription assistant willing to process malware-development requests that mainstream AI systems would reject. Sophos Counter Threat Unit (CTU) researchers discovered the offering on August 24, 2026, on the Exploit underground forum.

Cyber Security News

By Guru Baran · cybersecuritynews.com

Read the full article at Cyber Security News

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.