Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

OpenAI reportedly closes in on solving the Hodge conjecture, its second Millennium Prize Problem

The Decoderby Matthias Bastian ()1 min read1
AI summary · glm-5.3-flashSummaries by Vani AI

OpenAI is reportedly nearing a solution to the Hodge conjecture, its second Millennium Prize Problem, though an announcement may be delayed.

According to a person familiar with the matter, OpenAI employees expect a solution to the Hodge conjecture soon, but any announcement could be delayed as the company manages messaging after the PR crisis around its still unconfirmed Navier-Stokes solution. That earlier result was achieved with a variant of OpenAI's next pretrained model, codenamed "Doug," likely at a cost of millions of dollars. Chief researcher Jakub Pachocki has said OpenAI's priority is recursive self-improvement rather than math, though some insiders believe the math results could feed into that effort. The math community is reportedly more angry than impressed.

Key facts
  • Reported Hodge conjecture progress follows OpenAI's officially unconfirmed Navier-Stokes solution.
  • Navier-Stokes work used a variant of OpenAI's next pretrained model, codenamed "Doug," costing millions.
  • Employees expect a solution soon, but announcements may be delayed to improve messaging.
  • Some insiders believe math breakthroughs could feed recursive self-improvement; mathematicians are skeptical.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at the-decoder.com

OpenAI is reportedly tackling the next Millennium Prize Problem. After its still unconfirmed solution to the Navier-Stokes problem, the company is now working on the Hodge conjecture. Employees expect a solution soon, but any announcement could be delayed.

The Decoder

By Matthias Bastian · the-decoder.com

Read the full article at The Decoder

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.