The 12 Best Mobile Threat Defense (MTD) Solutions, Compared and Priced

Best value overall: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint mobile threat defence is included in appropriate Defender licensing, which means many organizations already own it.

Best detection: Zimperium, with fully on-device analysis.

Best for Apple estates on Jamf: Jamf.

Best privacy positioning: Pradeo and Zimperium, both of which can analyse without shipping your traffic to a cloud.

Mobile Threat Defense (MTD) expands endpoint visibility beyond traditional workstations, feeding mobile device health directly into a Zero Trust security architecture.

Two Things to Fix on Your Shortlist

Kaspersky cannot legally be sold or updated in the United States. The US Commerce Department issued a determination prohibiting Kaspersky from selling software or providing updates to US customers, and the company exited the US market.

Its mobile technology remains available in many other jurisdictions. US organizations should not evaluate it; others should check current national guidance and any customer contractual obligations.

Quixxi is application shielding, not mobile threat defence. It protects apps you build code obfuscation, tamper detection, runtime application self-protection — which is a genuinely useful category but a completely different purchase from protecting the phones your staff carry.

If you’re securing a mobile app you publish, it belongs on your list. If you’re protecting an employee fleet, it does not. We’ve included it below with that distinction made explicit, because several MTD comparison lists carry it without explanation.

Also worth knowing: Wandera no longer exists as a brand Jamf acquired it and folded the technology into its security portfolio. Lists showing both Jamf and Wandera separately are working from outdated sources.

Full Comparison Table

Product	Analysis model	Pricing	iOS depth	Android depth	UEM integration	Best for
Zimperium	Fully on-device	Quote	Strong	Strong	Broad	Sophisticated threats
Lookout	Cloud + device	Quote	Strong	Strong	Broad	Mobile-first enterprise
Microsoft Defender	Cloud + device	In Defender licensing	Moderate	Strong	Native (Intune)	Best value
Jamf	Network + device	Quote	Strong	Limited	Native (Jamf)	Apple estates
Check Point Harmony Mobile	Cloud + device	Quote	Strong	Strong	Broad	Check Point estates
Pradeo	On-prem option	Quote	Strong	Strong	Broad	EU privacy requirements
DNSFilter	DNS-layer / network	Subscription	Moderate	Moderate	Limited	Lightweight DNS protection
Ivanti	Cloud + device	Quote	Moderate	Moderate	Native (Ivanti)	Ivanti estates
BlackBerry	Cloud + device	Quote	Moderate	Moderate	Native (BB UEM)	High-assurance
Broadcom (Symantec)	Cloud + device	Quote	Moderate	Moderate	Moderate	Symantec estates
Trellix	Cloud + device	Quote	Moderate	Moderate	Moderate	Trellix estates
Kaspersky	Cloud + device	Where available	Strong	Strong	Moderate	Check jurisdiction
Quixxi	App shielding	Quote	n/a	n/a	n/a	Apps you publish

The Decision Matrix

If this describes you	Choose	Why
Hold Microsoft Defender licensing	Microsoft Defender for Endpoint	Included — check before buying
Executives or staff plausibly targeted	Zimperium	On-device detection of sophisticated threats
Mobile is your primary work surface	Lookout	Very large mobile threat dataset
Apple estate managed with Jamf	Jamf	Native integration, no second vendor
Already run Check Point	Check Point Harmony Mobile	Unified policy and threat prevention
EU data residency is mandatory	Pradeo	European vendor, on-premises option
Want minimal deployment footprint	DNSFilter	Lightweight DNS-layer security with straightforward deployment
Government or defence	BlackBerry	Certifications and secure comms heritage
Building a mobile app to publish	Quixxi	App shielding — a different purchase

What MTD Actually Costs

Almost nothing here is published. MTD is quote-based across the board, typically per device or per user per year.

The one exception is Microsoft, where mobile threat defence is included in appropriate Defender for Endpoint licensing which makes it the cheapest credible starting point for a large share of the market.

Establish whether you need it at all before you price it. For many organizations, well-configured MDM plus Android Enterprise work profiles plus iOS platform protections plus conditional access covers the realistic threat model.

MTD earns its cost when mobile is a primary work surface, when your people are plausibly targeted, or when compliance requires demonstrable mobile threat detection.

The specialists command a premium and largely justify it. Zimperium and Lookout cost more than the platform vendors’ bundled mobile capability, and their detection of sophisticated mobile threats is meaningfully deeper. Whether that difference matters depends entirely on your threat model.

Watch for per-device versus per-user. Staff with a phone and tablet count twice under per-device licensing. Ask which model applies.

Bundled options are often sufficient and always cheaper. If you already run Check Point, Ivanti, BlackBerry, or Jamf for device management, their mobile threat capability is an incremental subscription rather than a new vendor relationship and it will integrate with your existing policy engine without work.

The Twelve, Briefly

Zimperium.

Fully on-device machine learning detection covering device, network, application, and phishing threats no traffic leaves the phone for analysis, which is both privacy-preserving and effective offline.

Integrates with actionable threat intelligence tools with a strong record identifying novel mobile exploits.

Weakness: premium pricing; more capability than many organizations will use.

Lookout.

More than a decade of mobile threat telemetry behind strong phishing protection and app risk analysis, bridging telemetry alongside modern cloud security solutions.

Lookout divested its enterprise cloud security portfolio and refocused on mobile, which arguably strengthens the offering.

Weakness: some analysis is cloud-dependent; confirm the current product lineup.

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint.

Mobile threat defence for iOS and Android included in appropriate Defender licensing, feeding directly into Entra ID conditional access and central endpoint detection and response (EDR) pipelines so a compromised phone loses access automatically.

Weakness: detection depth on sophisticated threats trails the specialists; iOS capability more limited than Android.

Jamf.

Mobile threat defence built on Wandera technology, integrated natively with Jamf device management, with strong network-level protection and content filtering from one of the top cybersecurity companies.

Weakness: deepest value only inside a Jamf estate; Android is secondary.

Check Point Harmony Mobile.

Check Point’s threat prevention engines applied to mobile, with strong anti-phishing and unified management alongside next-generation firewalls (NGFWs) and its wider platform.

Check Point posted a 100% block rate with 100% accuracy in independent cloud firewall testing.

Weakness: best value inside a Check Point estate; Harmony licensing needs mapping.

Pradeo.

European specialist with detailed application behaviour and data-leakage analysis, strong privacy positioning, and flexible on-premises security controls deployment options.

Weakness: smaller presence outside Europe; fewer integrations.

DNSFilter

A lightweight Protective DNS approach that blocks phishing, malware, botnets, and other malicious domains at the DNS layer, with deployment through DNS forwarding or a lightweight roaming client.

It can protect users both on and off the corporate network.

Weakness: narrower than a full mobile threat-defense platform because its primary control point is DNS/network traffic rather than deep on-device mobile threat analysis.

Confirm whether DNS-layer protection provides sufficient coverage for your mobile threat model.

Ivanti.

Mobile threat defence integrated with Ivanti mobile management and automated patch management tools, giving a single vendor for management and detection.

Weakness: detection depth trails the specialists; Ivanti products have featured in multiple exploited-vulnerability advisories in recent years make vulnerability-response commitments explicit.

BlackBerry.

Mobile security within BlackBerry’s secure communications and UEM portfolio, coordinating with business VPN solutions and strong government certifications.

Weakness: confirm strategic commitment to the retained mobile business following the February 2025 divestiture of Cylance to Arctic Wolf.

Broadcom (Symantec).

Mobile threat defence within Symantec’s endpoint portfolio under Broadcom, functioning as an extension of standard antivirus software suites.

Weakness: Broadcom’s licensing and support model changes have prompted many enterprise customers to reassess evaluate the commercial relationship as carefully as the technology; mobile is a small part of a very large portfolio.

Trellix.

Mobile security correlated with the wider Trellix detection estate, upholding established network security principles across multi-vector environments.

Weakness: portfolio consolidation since the McAfee Enterprise and FireEye merger warrants a roadmap conversation, particularly for smaller lines like mobile.

Kaspersky.

Capable mobile detection with advanced threat intelligence and sandbox analysis, but prohibited for sale and updates to US customers following the Commerce Department determination, with several other governments restricting public sector use.

Action: US organizations should not evaluate it; others should check current national guidance.

Quixxi (different category).

Application shielding for mobile apps you develop and publish obfuscation, tamper detection, runtime protection, often assessed alongside open-source security and penetration testing tools.

Genuinely useful if you ship a mobile app; irrelevant to protecting an employee device fleet. Listed for clarity because it appears on several MTD comparisons without this distinction.

How to Compare MTD Quotes

Check Microsoft first. Mobile threat defence is included in appropriate Defender for Endpoint licensing. For organizations already holding it, that’s the baseline against which everything else must justify its price.

Ask where analysis happens. On-device, in the cloud, or both. This determines your privacy posture, your regulatory position, whether protection works offline, and how defensible the deployment is in a works council or employee relations conversation.

Zimperium’s fully on-device model and Pradeo’s on-premises option are meaningfully different from cloud-dependent approaches.

Test phishing detection outside email. Send test links via SMS, WhatsApp, and QR code. Mobile phishing overwhelmingly arrives through channels your email security never sees, and email-only protection is not mobile phishing protection.

Check iOS and Android capability separately. Apple’s platform restrictions limit what any MTD can do on iOS, and vendors differ substantially in how much they achieve within those limits. Never accept a single “supports both” claim.

Verify the UEM integration loop end to end. MTD must be able to tell your MDM platform to mark a device non-compliant, which triggers conditional access to block corporate resources. Test the whole loop on a real device before buying.

Common mistakes: buying MTD without conditional access integration, so detections change nothing; assuming MDM compliance means the device is safe; and deploying full traffic inspection on personally owned devices without explaining it, which generates resistance disproportionate to the security gain.

Cost-Focused FAQ

How much does mobile threat defense cost?

MTD is priced per device or per user per year and nearly all vendors are quote-based.

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint includes mobile threat defence in appropriate licensing tiers at no additional cost, making it the cheapest credible option for organizations already holding it. Specialist vendors such as Zimperium and Lookout command a premium for deeper detection.

Which MTD is cheapest?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, for organizations with appropriate Defender licensing it is included.

Beyond that, if you already run Check Point, Ivanti, BlackBerry, or Jamf for device management, their mobile capability is an incremental subscription rather than a new vendor relationship, which is almost always cheaper than a specialist.

Do I need MTD if I have MDM?

Not always. MDM enforces configuration passcodes, encryption, app policy but detects nothing. A fully compliant device can still run a malicious app or connect through a hostile network.

MTD adds detection. Whether you need it depends on whether mobile is a primary work surface and whether your people are plausibly targeted.

Is Kaspersky mobile security available?

Not in the United States. The US Commerce Department prohibited Kaspersky from selling software or providing updates to US customers and the company exited the US market.

It remains available in many other jurisdictions, but organizations elsewhere should check current national guidance and any customer contractual requirements.

What is the difference between MTD and app shielding?

MTD protects the devices your staff carry, detecting malicious apps, phishing, hostile networks, and device compromise.

Application shielding Quixxi’s category protects mobile apps you develop and publish against reverse engineering, tampering, and runtime attacks.

They are different purchases solving different problems, though both appear on MTD comparison lists.

Should MTD analysis happen on-device or in the cloud?

On-device analysis is more privacy-preserving, works offline, and is considerably easier to justify to employees and works councils Zimperium’s fully on-device model is the clearest example.

Cloud analysis can apply larger models and cross-customer intelligence. For BYOD deployments, on-device is generally the more defensible choice.

Bottom Line

Check your Microsoft Defender licensing first mobile threat defence is included in appropriate tiers, and for many organizations that covers the realistic threat model at zero marginal cost.

Move up to Zimperium when detection of sophisticated threats matters and on-device analysis is a requirement, or Lookout when mobile is your primary work surface.

Jamf and Check Point Harmony Mobile are the low-friction answers inside those respective estates, and Pradeo the pick for EU data residency. Remove Kaspersky if you’re in the US, and remember that Quixxi solves a different problem entirely.

More on GBHackers:

• Best Mobile Device Management (MDM) Solutions, Compared and Priced

• Best Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) Solutions, Compared and Priced

• Best Antivirus (Endpoint Protection) Software for Business, Compared and Priced

• Best Endpoint Detection & Response (EDR) Solutions, Compared and Priced

• Best DNS Filtering Solutions

• Best Zero Trust Solutions

• Best Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) Solutions

• Best Patch Management Software, Compared and Priced

• Best EDR Companies

• Best Network Security Tools

• Best Cybersecurity Companies