Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Researchers Find Security Risks in 73.6% of 61,500 Abandoned IoT Apps

GBHackersby Divya ()3 min read2 · 1 read
AI summary · glm-5.3-flashSummaries by Vani AI

A study of 61,500 abandoned Android IoT companion apps found 73.6% contain vulnerable libraries, dead domains, or insecure data flows exposing sensitive user data.

The study 'When Apps Outlive Vendors: Security Implications of IoT Abandonware' analyzed 61,500 abandoned Android IoT companion apps, including 54,886 removed from Google Play and 6,614 unpatched since March 2023. 45,248 apps (73.6%) contained libraries with known CVEs, 67.6% of them rated High or Critical, though manual validation showed a 52.5% false-positive rate for CVE applicability. Researchers extracted 168,718 unique domains, 24.2% unreachable, and found 3,066 apps with malicious URLs, while 40.8% of unique data sinks flowed to dead, blocklisted, or ownership-changed infrastructure versus 0.4% for maintained apps.

Key facts
  • 73.6% of abandoned apps embed libraries with known CVEs, 67.6% rated High or Critical.
  • Manual validation found a 52.5% false-positive rate for CVE-to-library matching.
  • 3,066 apps contained malicious URLs; 24.2% of 168,718 extracted domains were unreachable.
  • 40.8% of data sinks flow to dead, blocklisted, or ownership-changed domains.
  • Recommendations: inventory companion apps, revoke permissions, and isolate legacy IoT devices.
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

3 min read at gbhackers.com

Researchers have identified significant security and privacy risks across 61,500 abandoned Android Internet-of-Things (IoT) companion applications. Their study found that 73. 6% of these apps contained at least one potential vulnerability, risky embedded resource, or insecure communication path.

GBHackers

By Divya · gbhackers.com

Read the full article at GBHackers

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.