LinkedIn wins court order blocking mass scraping of user data
A California federal judge finalized a consent judgment barring ProAPIs and Netswift from mass-scraping LinkedIn via millions of fake accounts.
A California federal judge finalized an agreement between LinkedIn, ProAPIs, and Netswift requiring the firms to stop large-scale scraping, stop selling and transferring scraped data, stop accessing LinkedIn via fake accounts, and delete collected data. LinkedIn's October lawsuit alleged the companies operated a network of millions of bogus accounts harvesting member, company, and school data plus reactions, comments, and posts. LinkedIn said it typically blocked fake accounts within hours, but the firms allegedly created hundreds to thousands of new accounts daily, making blocking ineffective. The ruling follows another LinkedIn scraping-related legal win roughly five months earlier.
- Consent judgment requires firms to stop scraping and delete collected LinkedIn data
- Millions of fake accounts allegedly harvested profiles, posts, and reactions
- Firms reportedly created hundreds to thousands of new accounts daily
- Second scraping-related legal win for LinkedIn in about five months
From the original article
2 min read at therecord.mediaThe agreement between LinkedIn, ProAPIs and joint business operator Netswift also requires the firms to stop selling and transferring the data, no longer access LinkedIn through fake accounts and delete the data that was scraped, according to a senior LinkedIn executive.
therecord.media
A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.