Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Miles v0.1: Production-Level Post-Training

Hugging Face daily papersby RadixArk, Tom Chen, Mao Cheng ()1 min read3 · 1 read
AI summary · glm-5.3-flashSummaries by Vani AI

Radix Ark open-sources Miles v0.1, a full-stack RL post-training framework demonstrated with asynchronous agentic RL on GLM-5.2 744B-A40B across 64 GB300 GPUs.

Miles v0.1 is a full-stack, open-source system for frontier-scale reinforcement-learning post-training, built on slime with rollout engines on SGLang and trainers supporting NVIDIA Megatron-LM and PyTorch FSDP backends plus three weight-synchronization transports. It supports full-parameter RL, LoRA RL, on-policy distillation, supervised fine-tuning, true-on-policy rollout-training alignment, and extends to diffusion models. The end-to-end case study ran fully asynchronous agentic RL on GLM-5.2 744B-A40B for terminal-use coding tasks on 64 NVIDIA GB300 GPUs with a median step time of 263 seconds over the first 30 measured steps. The code is open-sourced on GitHub.

Key facts
  • Rollout engines built on SGLang; trainers support Megatron-LM and PyTorch FSDP backends.
  • Supports full-parameter RL, LoRA RL, on-policy distillation, SFT, and diffusion models.
  • Case study: asynchronous agentic RL on GLM-5.2 744B-A40B over terminal-use coding tasks.
  • Ran on 64 NVIDIA GB300 GPUs with a 263-second median step time.
  • Open-sourced at github.com/radixark/miles.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at huggingface.co

We present Miles v0. 1, a full-stack, production-ready system for frontier post-training. Building upon the clean design of slime, Miles designs each stage of the reinforcement-learning (RL) training loop around a single principle: components should be verified, clean, and customizable.

Hugging Face daily papers

By RadixArk, Tom Chen, Mao Cheng · huggingface.co

Read the full article at Hugging Face daily papers

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.