Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Using Context Is Not Enough: Test-Time Training for Personalized Reward Modeling

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CLby Bohao Wang ()1 min read2
AI summary · grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

P-TTT personalizes reward models with test-time fast weights, beating in-context preference conditioning without backprop.

Most RLHF pipelines train one reward model and miss individual preference differences, while in-context personalized reward models often fail to use the relations in a user's historical comparisons. Preference-Aligned Test-Time Training (P-TTT) encodes those pairwise relations into user-specific fast weights. Sequence-level update and apply operations match the granularity of preference feedback, and adaptation runs in a single forward pass without inference-time backpropagation. Experiments show P-TTT captures historical preferences more effectively and outperforms prior personalized reward methods by a large margin.

Key facts
  • In-context personalized reward models miss relations in historical preference pairs.
  • P-TTT writes those relations into user-specific fast weights at test time.
  • Updates happen in one forward pass without inference-time backpropagation.
  • Sequence-level update and apply match response-level preference feedback.
  • Experiments report a large margin over state-of-the-art personalized reward methods.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) aligns large language models (LLMs) with human preferences, yet most pipelines learn a single reward model that overlooks individual differences in preferences.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

By Bohao Wang · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.