Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

ConwayResearch publishes Underdog Woof, a 40.6 MB English TTS model

Original title: ConwayResearch/Underdog-Woof — new model trending #30 on Hugging Face

Hugging Face trending modelsby ConwayResearch ()7 min read
Part of a story covered by 5 sourcesComfy-Org MiniMax H3 Image pack trends at #30 on Hugging FaceMerged summary & timeline
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

The model card claims 1.42% word error rate for Mira and CPU-only synthesis with numpy.

ConwayResearch released Underdog Woof, a small English text-to-speech model with Juno and Mira voices, trending on Hugging Face. The card says the two-voice package is a 40.6 MB file and runs on a laptop CPU with numpy, without a GPU or API key. Accuracy and speed figures are the publisher’s own measurements against other TTS systems.

Unconfirmed: Speed and error-rate comparisons are the publisher’s own tests, not an independent evaluation.

Key facts
  • The card lists Mira at 1.42% word error rate on Gradium TTS Hard Cases.
  • Juno is listed at 13.8 times real time on one Apple M5 Max CPU thread.
  • Peak memory is listed as 402 MB for Juno and 601 MB for Mira.
  • The one-voice build is listed at 31.7 MB and 2.06% word error rate.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

7 min read at huggingface.co

[Underdog Woof beats models 1,000x its size: download size against word error rate on Gradium TTS Hard Cases, with both Woof models on the Pareto frontier ahead of Fish Audio Drama 3, Phonon, Kokoro, Pocket TTS, Supertonic 3, Kitten Nano, Qwen3-TTS and Liquid AI LFM3-Audio-2B](assets/woof-frontier. png) - **1,022x smaller than Fish Audio Drama 3** (41. 5 GB), with **25% fewer word errors** - **1.

Hugging Face trending models

By ConwayResearch · huggingface.co

Read the full article at Hugging Face trending models

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.