Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

CoT reasoning generalizes via shared predictors in LLMs

Original title: Understanding the Out-of-Distribution Generalization of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in LLMs

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CLby Nuo-Jing Liang ()1 min read
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

CoT generalizes OOD by composing reusable ID transitions with risk bounded by O(k) coefficient.

Chain-of-Thought improves LLMs but OOD generalization mechanisms were underexplored. CoT acts as compositional OOD generalization using shared single-step predictors on atomic ID data. Theoretical analysis shows OOD task risk controlled by sum of ID sub-task risks scaled by O(k), with estimation term of order O(sqrt(T/n)). Experiments on Atom-Task and GSM8K support short-to-long and compositional generalization, with explicit state tracking crucial.

Key facts
  • Generalizes by applying shared single-step predictor
  • OOD risk controlled by ID risks scaled by O(k)
  • Estimation term O(sqrt(T/n))
  • Experiments support short-to-long generalization
  • Code at https://github.com/maxliang114514/CoT-OOD
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning substantially improves Large Language Models (LLMs), yet its out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization mechanism remains theoretically underexplored. We study CoT as compositional OOD generalization: the target task lacks complete reasoning trajectories or direct input-output pairs, while training provides only in-distribution (ID) atomic step data.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

By Nuo-Jing Liang · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.