Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Bounded Provisional Visibility: Controlling Poisoning Exposure in Continuously Ingested RAG Vector Stores

arXiv cs.CRby Chuhong Xu ()1 min read2 · 1 read
AI summary · grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

A fail-closed protocol limits how long unvetted RAG documents remain retrievable during continuous ingestion.

Continuous RAG ingestion can expose new documents to retrieval before vetting finishes. The authors propose a fail-closed provisional-visibility protocol that admits content under a deadline, hides late verifications, and supports lineage-scoped containment. On five workloads using an exact backend and Milvus, the deadline reduced median poisoned retrievals from 34 to 7 versus asynchronous admission. Verify-before-visible avoided provisional exposure but delayed clean visibility to 6.3 seconds, while provisional admission showed content within 3 ms; detector errors still determined whether poison remained visible.

Key facts
  • Deadline cut median poisoned retrievals from 34 to 7
  • Bound equals visibility budget plus query-path enforcement delay
  • Verify-before-visible delayed clean first visibility to 6.3 seconds
  • Provisional admission made content visible within 3 ms
  • False detector promotions left poison retrievable
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Continuous ingestion can expose new retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) content to retrieval before vetting completes, creating a temporal attack surface that conventional admission decisions do not capture. We present a fail-closed provisional-visibility protocol that admits new content under a deadline, hides items whose verification has not committed in time, and supports lineage-scoped containment.

arXiv cs.CR

By Chuhong Xu · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.CR

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.