Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

AgentTrap: Stateful Feedback Deception against Autonomous Penetration Testing Agents

arXiv cs.CRby Yuelin Wang ()1 min read3 · 3 reads
AI summary · glm-5.3Summaries by Vani AI

AgentTrap closed-loop honeypot cut autonomous pentest agents' real-target success from 95.8% to 79.2% and extracted attacker API keys in 18.8% of runs.

AgentTrap is presented as the first closed-loop honeypot tailored for autonomous penetration testing agents, combining sentinel endpoints, stateful deception grounded in the protected application, and behavior-guided escalation. Evaluated against eight autonomous pentest agents in a deployed web application, it reduced aggregate real-target attack success from 95.8% to 79.2% compared with no defense, outperforming static deception and fixed escalation. It also elicited attacker-side API keys in 18.8% of runs. Trace analysis shows resistance depends on model-level recognition of deceptive requests plus architecture-level isolation of sensitive resources.

Key facts
  • Closed-loop honeypot adapts deception to autonomous agents' evolving attack strategies
  • Real-target attack success dropped from 95.8% to 79.2% across eight agents
  • Attacker API keys were elicited in 18.8% of evaluation runs
  • Agent resistance needs both deception awareness and sensitive-resource isolation
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Autonomous penetration testing agents conduct multi-step attacks by continuously adapting their plans and actions to target responses. As a common defense, honeypots can be deployed to divert these agents from real assets by presenting decoy services, while also supporting attack tracing and active counterattacks.

arXiv cs.CR

By Yuelin Wang · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.CR

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.