UK cyber bill targets AI users, not the vendors building it
UK ministers rejected Lords amendments that would have brought AI vendors into the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill's scope.
Cybersecurity minister Baroness Lloyd of Effra told the Grand Committee that regulating frontier AI developers through the UK Cyber Security and Resilience Bill would not prevent misuse by hostile actors, pointing instead to the AI Security Institute and the voluntary AI Cyber Security Code of Practice, which informed the ETSI EN 304 223 standard. Rejected amendments included requirements for AI vendors to demonstrate red lines such as evading human oversight, and last-resort powers to shut down a datacenter or widely deployed AI system during emergencies. The bill instead extends the NIS 2018 regime to managed service providers, datacenter operators and designated critical suppliers, imposing duties on regulated organizations rather than technology providers.
- Lords cited agentic misbehavior reports involving Anthropic and OpenAI while arguing for mandatory AI vendor duties
- Rejected amendment would have empowered the Secretary of State to shut down datacenters or AI systems in emergencies
- Bill brings MSPs, datacenter operators and critical suppliers into scope with potential daily fines
- Government points to AISI model testing and voluntary AI cybersecurity code of practice as alternatives
- Organizations
- UK GovernmentHouse of LordsAI Security InstituteNHS
- Countries
- United Kingdom
From the original article
4 min read at theregister.comMinisters reject proposed red lines and emergency shutdown powers, pointing instead to voluntary safeguards
By Connor Jones · theregister.com
A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.