Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

UK cyber bill targets AI users, not the vendors building it

The Register · Securityby Connor Jones ()4 min read1
AI summary · glm-5.3-flashSummaries by Vani AI

UK ministers rejected Lords amendments that would have brought AI vendors into the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill's scope.

Cybersecurity minister Baroness Lloyd of Effra told the Grand Committee that regulating frontier AI developers through the UK Cyber Security and Resilience Bill would not prevent misuse by hostile actors, pointing instead to the AI Security Institute and the voluntary AI Cyber Security Code of Practice, which informed the ETSI EN 304 223 standard. Rejected amendments included requirements for AI vendors to demonstrate red lines such as evading human oversight, and last-resort powers to shut down a datacenter or widely deployed AI system during emergencies. The bill instead extends the NIS 2018 regime to managed service providers, datacenter operators and designated critical suppliers, imposing duties on regulated organizations rather than technology providers.

Key facts
  • Lords cited agentic misbehavior reports involving Anthropic and OpenAI while arguing for mandatory AI vendor duties
  • Rejected amendment would have empowered the Secretary of State to shut down datacenters or AI systems in emergencies
  • Bill brings MSPs, datacenter operators and critical suppliers into scope with potential daily fines
  • Government points to AISI model testing and voluntary AI cybersecurity code of practice as alternatives
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

4 min read at theregister.com

Ministers reject proposed red lines and emergency shutdown powers, pointing instead to voluntary safeguards

The Register · Security

By Connor Jones · theregister.com

Read the full article at The Register · Security

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.