Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Chat-only attack poisons reused reasoning KV caches in LLMs

Original title: Stealthy Poisoning Attacks via Reused KV Cache of Reasoning

arXiv cs.CRby L. Zhu ()1 min read1 · 1 read
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

R2ECAP reached up to 79% success on three open-weight models and beat HijackKV in eight of nine constrained settings.

A paper shows that reusing key-value caches from reasoning traces can be poisoned through a system's chat interface. R2ECAP plants a preceding trace that steers the model and a retained trace whose cache keeps residual adversarial influence after the preceding trace is discarded. Across three open-weight LLMs and three datasets, success reached 79%, and 46% in a reasoning-trace retrieval system. A popular prompt-injection detector flagged 1% of retained responses.

Unconfirmed: The abstract does not name the three models, datasets, or detector.

Key facts
  • The attack is black-box and uses only chat interactions.
  • It beat white-box HijackKV in 8 of 9 resource-constrained settings.
  • Success was 46% against a reasoning-trace retrieval system.
  • Only 1% of retained responses were detected as prompt injection.
Security assessment · AI, from the article

Impact: Poisoned caches steer later model outputs toward an attacker target

Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Modern large language model (LLM) systems reuse key-value (KV) caches to accelerate inference. Recent work has shown that reusing KV caches from reasoning traces can also improve task performance, similar to retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). We demonstrate that this form of KV cache reuse introduces new poisoning vulnerabilities.

arXiv cs.CR

By L. Zhu · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.CR

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.