Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Open-Weight Decision Models Screen Web Passages Against Injection Attacks

Original title: Decision Models as Retrieval Gates Against Injection and Pollution

arXiv cs.CRby Mahdi Ghadamyari ()1 min read1 · 1 read
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

A Kev-4B gate reduces attack success from 27.9% to 5.7% on a 1,000-question benchmark.

The models read HTML passages to screen for injected instructions and synthetic pages. Attack success falls from 27.9% with no defence to 5.7% with the gate added. The gate takes 76 ms per passage and wrongly flags 4 of 186 benign pages.

Key facts
  • Attack success reduced from 27.9% to 5.7%.
  • Takes 76 ms per passage.
  • Wrongly flags 4 of 186 benign pages.
  • Holds accuracy at 83% on pollution testbed.
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Retrieved web text can carry instructions aimed at the language model, or synthetic pages written to mislead. We test whether released open-weight decision models, which answer typed questions about a text without generating tokens, can screen retrieved passages against both threats.

arXiv cs.CR

By Mahdi Ghadamyari · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.CR

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.