Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

DHS bans DeepSeek from US civilian federal agencies

Original title: DHS to ban DeepSeek from federal civilian agencies

CyberScoopby djohnson ()4 min read3 · 2 reads
Part of a story covered by 14 sourcesDHS orders civilian agencies to remove DeepSeek and halt buysMerged summary & timeline
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Agencies must remove existing copies and exclude future purchases, with exceptions requiring 60 days' notice.

The Department of Homeland Security is barring civilian federal agencies from procuring information technology products and services from Hangzhou DeepSeek Artificial Intelligence. A June 26 letter from Secretary Markwayne Mullin, due in the Federal Register, cites data stored on servers in China, collection of personal information and digital fingerprints, and the risk that prompts send sensitive data to the Chinese government. Agencies must drop copies already installed. DeepSeek is the only Chinese model named.

Unconfirmed: The order describes potential malware and intelligence risks; it does not report a confirmed federal compromise.

Key facts
  • The exclusion letter is dated June 26 and the ban has been in effect for months.
  • Exceptions need a request 60 days ahead and a compelling justification.
  • Agencies are encouraged to monitor traffic and log possible data exfiltration.
  • Mullin says some cited risks could also apply to other Chinese and US models.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

4 min read at cyberscoop.com

The order cites national security concerns, including sending data to servers in China, the potential malware and the overall risk to federal IT systems. The post DHS to ban DeepSeek from federal civilian agencies appeared first on CyberScoop.

CyberScoop

By djohnson · cyberscoop.com

Read the full article at CyberScoop

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.