Assessment of Machine Learning-Based Critical Heat Flux Models in the CTF Subchannel Code for Square Rod Bundle Prediction
Tube-trained machine-learning critical heat flux models inside CTF beat classic correlations on square rod-bundle data.
The paper evaluates machine-learning critical heat flux models inside the CTF subchannel code using the EPRI rod-bundle database. Both pure models and hybrid residual corrections are tested in local and semilocal forms. Tube-trained models generally transfer to rod bundles and outperform the Bowring and W-3 correlations and the 2006 Groeneveld lookup table. A local hybrid lookup-table model is strongest overall, with a semilocal pure ML model close behind.
- ML CHF models trained only on tubes transfer to square rod bundles.
- Local hybrid lookup-table model gives the best overall CTF results.
- Predictions beat Bowring, W-3, and the 2006 Groeneveld lookup table.
- Pure and hybrid residual models are tested in local and semilocal forms.
Full article220 words · extracted from arxiv.org · click to collapse
The prediction of critical heat flux (CHF), a key safety-related quantity in nuclear thermal hydraulics, remains an important challenge due to its direct relationship with fuel performance and reactor safety. Recent studies have demonstrated that relative to traditional empirical correlations and lookup tables (LUTs), machine learning (ML) methods can substantially improve CHF prediction accuracy. Most ML-based CHF models, however, have been developed and evaluated using tube databases, leaving their applicability to reactor-relevant rod bundle geometries largely unexplored. This study evaluates ML-based CHF models deployed within the CTF subchannel code using the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) rod bundle CHF database. Both pure and hybrid residual correction models are considered in local and semilocal formulations. The tube-trained ML CHF models generally transferred favorably to rod bundle applications and outperformed traditional CHF methods across most geometries and operating conditions. The local hybrid LUT model produced the strongest overall performance, and the semilocal pure ML model remained highly competitive. Comparison against the Bowring correlation, W-3 correlation, and 2006 Groeneveld LUT demonstrated that substantial improvements in rod bundle CHF prediction are possible even when models are trained exclusively on tube data. These findings provide one of the first large-scale assessments of ML-based CHF models in square rod bundles within a production-level subchannel analysis environment and support their broader application in reactor thermal hydraulic analysis.
Text extracted automatically; images, tables and formatting may be missing. Original: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.21995