Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Putting models to the secure coding test: Plan vs default mode

Datadog Security Labs ()2 · 1 read
AI summary · glm-5.3-flashSummaries by Vani AI

Datadog Security Labs tested Sonnet 5, Composer 2.5, and GPT 5.5 to see if plan mode yields more secure code than default mode.

Datadog Security Labs evaluated whether plan mode produces measurably more secure code than default mode. The test covered three frontier coding models: Sonnet 5, Composer 2.5, and GPT 5.5. The results inform how engineering teams should configure AI coding assistants to reduce insecure code. This is an AI security evaluation, not an incident report.

Key facts
  • Plan mode vs default mode compared on security
  • Models tested: Sonnet 5, Composer 2.5, GPT 5.5
  • Focus is measurable security of generated code
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

We tested Sonnet 5, Composer 2. 5, and GPT 5. 5 in plan mode and default mode to see whether plan mode produces measurably more secure code.

Datadog Security Labs

securitylabs.datadoghq.com

Read the full article at Datadog Security Labs

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.