Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

TSMC confirms unauthorized release of some employee data

Original title: TSMC has reportedly leaked the personal data of 46,000 employees, but emphasized that no evidence of intrusion was found in the system.

DataBreaches.netby Dissent ()2 min read1
Part of a story covered by 6 sourcesTSMC says employee data posted online via cloud providerMerged summary & timeline
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Sellers offered what they called 46,000 records, 6.9GB, for 3 bitcoin and threatened a full dump within a week.

An underground listing offered personal data said to belong to TSMC employees. TSMC said information on some current and former employees was posted without authorization and matches data held in a cloud provider's services. The company said there is no evidence its own systems were hacked and that the data is unrelated to production or customers.

Unconfirmed: The 46,000-record and 6.9GB figures come from the sellers; TSMC has not confirmed those totals.

Key facts
  • The sellers asked for 3 bitcoin, about NT$7.4 million.
  • They threatened to release the entire set if unsold within a week.
  • TSMC said the data does not involve production or customer information.
Security assessment · AI, from the article

Impact: Personal data of current and former employees exposed

Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

2 min read at databreaches.net

The following is an automated Google translation of an article that originally appeared in Chinese. Jian Yongxiang reports: TSMC, the world’s leading semiconductor foundry, has been hit by a major cybersecurity incident. Hackers were openly selling personal data, allegedly belonging to TSMC employees, on an underground forum.

DataBreaches.net

By Dissent · databreaches.net

Read the full article at DataBreaches.net

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.