Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

GameHorizon Suite: Multi-Horizon Data and Evaluation in Gameplay

Hugging Face daily papersby Yiran Wang, Xingyilang Yin, Junfu Pu ()1 min read2 · 1 read
AI summary · grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

GameHorizon pairs 5,000 hours of AAA gameplay data with offline and online multi-horizon model tests.

GameHorizon is a data and evaluation suite for gameplay across short and long temporal horizons. Its annotator builds multi-horizon instructions, and GameHorizon-Data contains 5,000 hours of aligned video, actions, and instructions from 21 AAA games recorded by 100 expert players. GameHorizon-Bench adds reproducible offline questions and stepwise online tests. Evaluation of 47 models through more than one million invocations shows a clear task-difficulty hierarchy and large capability gaps. The dataset, annotator, and benchmark are planned for release.

Key facts
  • GameHorizon-Data holds 5,000 hours from 21 games by 100 expert players.
  • An automated annotator produces multi-horizon language instructions.
  • Offline tests use thousands of standardized questions across three tasks.
  • Online stepwise tests check whether offline scores predict real play.
  • Forty-seven models were evaluated with over one million invocations.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at huggingface.co

Modern video games provide a measurable testbed for AI models, combining abilities of visual understanding, instruction decomposition, goal planning, and precise action control over multiple temporal horizons. Existing datasets and benchmarks, however, either cover a narrow range of games, lack language instructions, or rely on high-variance online rollouts.

Hugging Face daily papers

By Yiran Wang, Xingyilang Yin, Junfu Pu · huggingface.co

Read the full article at Hugging Face daily papers

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.