Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

A Hybrid LSTM-XGBoost Framework for Multi-Horizon Stock Return Prediction Across Diversified Equity Portfolios

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CLby Seif ElDein Mostafa ()1 min read2 · 1 read
AI summary · glm-5.3Summaries by Vani AI

Hybrid LSTM-XGBoost model predicts multi-horizon returns for 14 US equities, cutting 30-day RMSE to about one-third of a standalone LSTM baseline.

The paper combines a two-layer LSTM (64 hidden units) processing 60-day windows of five market features with an XGBoost regressor over a 78-dimensional hybrid feature vector including 14 technical indicators. It is trained on pooled data for 14 US equities across six sectors using chronological splits and per-stock MinMaxScaling to prevent look-ahead bias, and evaluated at 30, 90, 252, and 365 trading-day horizons. The hybrid achieves test RMSE of 0.0949 at 30 days, roughly one-third of the standalone LSTM, while 97.6% directional accuracy at 365 days largely tracks the base rate of positive returns.

Key facts
  • Two-stage LSTM plus XGBoost predicts returns across horizons up to 365 days
  • 30-day test RMSE of 0.0949, about one-third of standalone LSTM baseline
  • High long-horizon directional accuracy mostly reflects positive-return base rate
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Accurate prediction of equity returns remains a major challenge in computational finance due to the non-stationary, nonlinear, and low signal-to-noise ratio nature of financial time series. This paper proposes a hybrid two-stage architecture that combines a long short-term memory (LSTM) network with an XGBoost gradient-boosted regressor for multi-horizon stock return prediction across a diversified panel of 14 U. S.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

By Seif ElDein Mostafa · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.