Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour
Data breachhighExploited in the wild

Binance hackers stole $6.34 billion in crypto after months of planning

Original title: Binance says hackers who stole billions in crypto spent months planning the heist

Ars Technica · Securityby Dan Goodin ()4 min read1
Part of a story covered by 19 sourcesNorth Korean Hackers Steal $6.34B From Binance Hot WalletsMerged summary & timeline
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Hackers used fake job interviews, tampered software, and compromised AI tools to breach Binance and exfiltrate assets.

Binance confirmed that sophisticated hackers stole $6.34 billion in cryptocurrency from its exchange after a multi-stage campaign. The threat actors began no later than June and used social engineering via fake recruitment interviews along with malicious downloads, endpoint compromises, and internal AI tooling. Binance froze or intercepted $2.85 billion and set aside funds to cover the loss.

Key facts
  • Binance hot wallets sent 970500 SOL and 44200000 OP to attacker addresses
  • 18,270 BTC were sent to attacker-controlled addresses
  • Attackers used EIP-7702 mechanism to give smart contracts execution rights over hot wallets
  • Specialized revocation procedure was required due to MPC hot wallets
  • Binance provided Proof of Reserves page for verification
Security assessment · AI, from the articleExploited in the wild

Impact: $6.34 billion cryptocurrency theft

ProductAffectedFixed in
Binance hot wallets—2.85 billion
What to do
  1. 1.verify Proof of Reserves
  2. 2.monitor hot wallet transfers
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

4 min read at arstechnica.com

Techniques included laptop infections, compromised internal tooling, and fake job interviews.

Ars Technica · Security

By Dan Goodin · arstechnica.com

Read the full article at Ars Technica · Security

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.