DynaSolver neural operator predicts autoregressive 4D flow with dynamic boundaries
Original title: DynaSolver: A Neural Operator for Autoregressive 4D Flow Prediction with Dynamic Boundaries
DynaSolver conditions on boundary evolution and flow history to predict unsteady flows induced by moving boundaries in computational fluid dynamics.
Neural operators provide efficient surrogates for computational fluid dynamics but are not equipped for unsteady flows with continuously moving boundaries. We study dynamic-boundary 4D CFD prediction for articulated moving geometries and introduce RoboCFD-4D, a temporally resolved robotic CFD benchmark spanning diverse morphologies and flow conditions. To address the computational and autoregressive challenges, we propose DynaSolver, a neural operator that explicitly conditions on boundary evolution and causal flow history. DynaSolver employs an efficient physical-token formulation that amortizes point-to-token projection across the operator stack. We further introduce Replay-Augmented Parallel Training, which exposes the model to autoregressively generated histories while preserving parallel dense supervision. Experiments on RoboCFD-4D show that DynaSolver achieves the best full-rollout accuracy among a broad range of learned CFD surrogates, with its advantage increasing as rollout proceeds.
- DynaSolver reduces autoregressive error accumulation.
- Uses physical-token formulation for point-to-token projection.
- Benchmark RoboCFD-4D spans diverse morphologies and flow conditions.
From the original article
1 min read at arxiv.orgNeural operators provide efficient surrogates for computational fluid dynamics (CFD), but most are designed for static geometries and are not equipped to model unsteady flows induced by continuously moving boundaries. We study dynamic-boundary 4D CFD prediction for articulated moving geometries and introduce RoboCFD-4D, a temporally resolved robotic CFD benchmark spanning diverse morphologies and flow conditions.
By Rui Qian · arxiv.org
A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.