Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

THEATRON benchmark tests persona persistence in long LLM decisions

Original title: THEATRON: A Benchmark for Evaluating Persona Persistence in Long-Horizon LLM Decision-Making

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CLby Yuyan Wang ()1 min read
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Four LLMs show persona-driven shifts that often fail to become stable, context-sensitive policies over multi-month financial trajectories.

Researchers introduce THEATRON, a controlled benchmark that uses financial replay to test whether fixed behavioral-finance personas persist during long sequential decisions. Models see shared daily market evidence and account-state feedback, then act over multi-month trajectories. Zero-shot, one-shot, and chain-of-thought persona injection are compared across four unnamed LLMs. Conditioning shifts behavior beyond a no-persona baseline, but separation can come from stereotyped action collapse or noisy switching rather than coherent policies. Code and data are public.

Unconfirmed: The paper does not name the four LLMs or report independent replication.

Key facts
  • Evaluations cover Zero-Shot, One-Shot, and Chain-of-Thought persona injection.
  • Metrics include cumulative return and action trajectories.
  • Persona separation generally exceeds variation from equivalent wording.
  • Stable separation can reflect stereotyped action collapse.
  • Code and benchmark data are on GitHub.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Existing evaluations often test persona expression rather than whether persona information persists in extended decision-making. We introduce THEATRON, a controlled benchmark that uses financial replay to evaluate persona persistence in long-horizon sequential decision-making.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

By Yuyan Wang · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.