Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Recursive Environment Scaling for General Long-Horizon Agents

Hugging Face daily papersby Lingxiao Jing, Zhengbo Jiao, Yichen Xiang ()1 min read1 · 1 read
AI summary · grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Recursive Environment Scaling hardens agent benchmarks and improves fine-tuning by up to 14.61 points.

Recursive Environment Scaling (RES) increases agent-benchmark difficulty without changing core objectives by altering information access, resource relations, and execution dependencies, then validating candidates and inheriting accepted changes. On 294 initial tasks from three benchmarks, all six evaluated models succeed less often, with drops of 57.14 to 77.14 percentage points on Claw-Eval-Live. With equal trajectory counts and identical optimization, fine-tuning on RES trajectories beats original-trajectory supervised fine-tuning in all nine model-benchmark comparisons by 7.00 to 14.61 points. Ablations point to recursive inheritance and dependency composition as key sources of difficulty.

Key facts
  • RES scales environments while keeping original task objectives fixed.
  • Success on 294 tasks drops, including 57.14 to 77.14 points on Claw-Eval-Live.
  • RES-trajectory fine-tuning beats original SFT by 7.00 to 14.61 points.
  • Ablations credit recursive inheritance and dependency composition for added difficulty.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at huggingface.co

We study environment scaling as a way to increase agent-benchmark difficulty while holding core task objectives fixed. Our framework, Recursive Environment Scaling (RES), transforms existing benchmark environments while preserving their objectives and completion requirements.

Hugging Face daily papers

By Lingxiao Jing, Zhengbo Jiao, Yichen Xiang · huggingface.co

Read the full article at Hugging Face daily papers

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.