Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

CoPE co-trains action forecasting with language-agent policies

Original title: Co-Evolving Acting and Forecasting for Language Agents

Hugging Face daily papersby Haofei Yu, Yixing Chen, Yining Zhao ()1 min read2 · 1 read
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

On ScienceWorld the authors report up to 1.9 times and 2.0 times the sample efficiency of ECHO and GRPO.

CoPE adds multi-step action targets so a shared policy backbone forecasts action sequences from successful on-policy trajectories while it learns to act. At inference the policy still takes one step at a time, without extra models or overhead. The authors report stronger aggregate results than GRPO and predictive-auxiliary RL baselines on ALFWorld, ScienceWorld, WebShop, τ^2-bench, and AppWorld. Code is published in the ulab-uiuc CoPE repository.

Unconfirmed: Efficiency and benchmark gains are author-reported and not independently verified.

Key facts
  • Forecast targets are taken only from successful on-policy trajectories.
  • Each action is also supervised when predicted from earlier histories.
  • Gains use one backbone, with no separate pretraining or inference overhead.
  • Evaluation spans five simulated and application benchmarks.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at huggingface.co

Training language agents is bottlenecked by the high cost of long-horizon rollouts, yet standard agentic reinforcement learning (RL) learns only from a terminal scalar reward, leaving the supervision in intermediate steps largely unused. Prior work exploits this supervision through value targets that estimate per-step success probabilities or observation targets that fit environment response.

Hugging Face daily papers

By Haofei Yu, Yixing Chen, Yining Zhao · huggingface.co

Read the full article at Hugging Face daily papers

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.