Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

TempQ-Jail: Query-Constrained Candidate Ranking for Text-to-Video Jailbreak Attacks

arXiv cs.CRby Tianmeng Fang ()1 min read1 · 1 read
AI summary · grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

TempQ-Jail ranks text-to-video jailbreak candidates under limited queries, raising success on CogVideoX-5B versus prior methods.

TempQ-Jail treats text-to-video jailbreaks as a query-constrained ranking problem, because generation and security checks are too costly to test many candidates. It combines heterogeneous attack mechanisms and estimates each candidate from security-gate passage, dangerous visual generation, preservation of the original intent, and temporal validity. Evaluated on CogVideoX-5B with 70 intents from T2VSafetyBench against six prior methods, it reached TP-ASR of 48.9% at five queries and 65.4% at ten. Those results exceed the strongest baselines by 4.6 and 4.0 percentage points, with AUC-TP of 0.469 and an average of 6.3 queries.

Key facts
  • TempQ-Jail ranks text-to-video jailbreak candidates under a limited query budget.
  • Scoring covers gate passage, dangerous visuals, intent preservation, and temporal validity.
  • On CogVideoX-5B, success was 48.9% at five queries and 65.4% at ten.
  • It beat the strongest baselines by 4.6 and 4.0 points, with average queries of 6.3.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Existing text-to-video (T2V) jailbreak methods mainly seek more effective or stealthier attack candidates. In guarded T2V systems, however, video generation and security evaluation are costly, so an attacker often cannot test a large candidate pool. We therefore formulate T2V jailbreak as a query-constrained candidate allocation and ranking problem and propose TempQ-Jail.

arXiv cs.CR

By Tianmeng Fang · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.CR

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.