12 Serverless Security Options Compared (2026): Features & Pricing
A buyer-focused comparison of twelve serverless security offerings concludes no standalone SKU is worth buying in 2026, with function protection bundled inside CNAPP contracts.
The scorecard compares twelve serverless security options on function-protection depth, pricing visibility, platform attach economics, multi-runtime coverage, and vendor viability. Microsoft Defender for Cloud tops the weighted scores at 4.75, with Prisma Cloud at 4.60 and Datadog at 4.55 noted for publishing clean per-function rates. The piece warns that Thundra and Epsagon are defunct and that most vendors bill functions inside platform units where costs are hard to see. It also references the Aqua Security Trivy supply chain incident and Google's finalized acquisition of Wiz as market context.
- Microsoft Defender for Cloud scores highest at 4.75 on the buyer-side scorecard.
- Datadog is the only vendor publishing clean per-function pricing.
- Thundra and Epsagon are defunct; lists still selling them are stale.
- Most vendors bill serverless functions inside CNAPP or observability platform units.
From the original article
9 min read at gbhackers.com
Quick Answer: There is no standalone serverless-security SKU worth buying in 2026 functions are a line item inside CNAPP or observability contracts. Datadog publishes per-function rates (the category’s only clean anchor); Prisma Cloud carries the deepest lineage (PureSec); Aqua, Sysdig, Wiz, CloudGuard, and Fortinet (Lacework) bill functions inside platform units. Graveyard warning: Thundra and Epsagon […]
By Kavichselvan · gbhackers.com
A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.