Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour
Policy & legalinfoExploited in the wild

European parliament members call for slowdown of Serbia’s EU entry over spyware use

CyberScoopby Tim Starks ()3 min read2
AI summary · glm-5.3-flashSummaries by Vani AI

29 MEPs urge delaying Serbia's EU accession after researchers found Pegasus and NoviSpy spyware on student activists' phones.

Twenty-nine Members of the European Parliament sent a letter Friday demanding Serbia's EU accession be slowed until an investigation into its spyware use is completed. The letter follows a SHARE Foundation report, with Amnesty International and the Citizen Lab, documenting Pegasus and NoviSpy infections on Serbian student activists' phones; NoviSpy evidence pointed to Serbian government authorities, though Pegasus attribution was not assigned. The MEPs also urged European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen to cancel a planned visit to Serbia and called the surveillance 'a direct state attack on democracy' ahead of upcoming elections. The Serbian government did not respond to requests for comment.

Key facts
  • 29 MEPs want Serbia's EU accession slowed pending a spyware investigation
  • Citizen Lab, Amnesty International, and SHARE Foundation found Pegasus and NoviSpy on activists' phones
  • NoviSpy infections were attributed to Serbian authorities; Pegasus attribution remains unassigned
  • Demands include rule-of-law accountability conditions and canceling von der Leyen's Serbia visit
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

3 min read at cyberscoop.com

The letter follows revelations about Serbian student activists being infected with Pegasus and NoviSpy, and coincides with other pressures on Belgrade. The post European parliament members call for slowdown of Serbia’s EU entry over spyware use appeared first on CyberScoop.

CyberScoop

By Tim Starks · cyberscoop.com

Read the full article at CyberScoop

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.