Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

26,400 live credentials found scanning 7.25M Gitee repos

Original title: 26,400 live credentials found scanning 7.25M repos on China's Gitee

Hacker News · securityby kernelrocks ()7 min read1
Part of a story covered by 2 sourcesScan finds 26,400 live credentials in public Gitee repositoriesMerged summary & timeline
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

TruffleHog and Kingfisher verified cloud keys and an unnamed enterprise AI platform's organization-admin credential.

Researcher Ben Zimmermann, with MongoDB's Kingfisher team, enumerated 7,256,531 public repositories on Gitee, China's national Git host. Concurrent TruffleHog and Kingfisher scans verified 26,400 unique live credentials, including cloud-provider access keys and an organization-admin credential for an unnamed major enterprise AI platform. Gitee has no public equivalent of GitHub's vendor secret-scanning partnerships.

Unconfirmed: The enterprise AI platform is unnamed, and the credential counts are the researcher's.

Key facts
  • Enumeration used user search, Explore feeds, profile pages, and an Elasticsearch widget.
  • The username seed corpus contained 1,704,759 names.
  • The Modal scan ran about one month and cost $3,097.64.
  • Each scanner verified credentials the other missed.
Security assessment · AI, from the article

Impact: 26,400 unique verified-live credentials, including cloud keys

What to do
  1. 1.Revoke and rotate credentials that appear in public Gitee repository history.
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

7 min read at mongodb.com

This guest post by independent security researcher Ben Zimmermann was developed in collaboration with the Kingfisher team at MongoDB. Ben specializes in large-scale credential exposure research across public source-hosting platforms.

Hacker News · security

By kernelrocks · mongodb.com

Read the full article at Hacker News · security

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.