Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Syrian Electronic Army hacker sentenced to 42 months

Original title: Syrian Electronic Army hacker gets prison time for attacks on Western targets

The Record ()2 min read
Part of a story covered by 4 sourcesSyrian Electronic Army hacker Agha sentenced to 42 monthsMerged summary & timeline
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Ahmad Umar Agha, known as Th3Pr0, was jailed Thursday; co-defendant Firas Dardar remains a fugitive.

The Justice Department said Ahmad Umar Agha of the Syrian Electronic Army was sentenced in federal court in Virginia to 42 months for campaigns against nearly 50 Western media outlets, nonprofits and other U.S.-allied entities. Prosecutors said the conspiracy was organized by advisers to former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and collected intelligence for his government. Agha was first charged in 2014, indicted in 2018 and taken into U.S. custody last year; the department has not described the arrest.

Unconfirmed: The Justice Department has not given details of how or where Agha was arrested.

Key facts
  • A 2013 fake AP tweet about an injured President Obama caused a brief $136 billion market dip.
  • A 2014 FBI affidavit tied an AP Twitter password-reset email to an address used by Agha.
  • He redirected Marine Corps recruiting-site visitors to a message urging them to join the Syrian Army.
  • In 2016 the FBI put Agha and Firas Dardar on its Cyber’s Most Wanted list with a $100,000 reward.
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

2 min read at therecord.media

Ahmad Umar Agha, known online as “Th3Pr0,” was sentenced Thursday in federal court in Virginia to 42 months behind bars for his role in a conspiracy that was organized by former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's closest advisers.

The Record

therecord.media

Read the full article at The Record

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.