PHP2Shell exploit attempts rise, but experts doubt they succeed
Original title: Reports of PHP bug exploitation attempts grow as experts downplay viability of exploits
Amazon and others report scans since October 17, while researchers say public PoCs fail on typical PHP setups.
Attempted exploitation of CVE-2026-109618 and CVE-2026-109619, called PHP2Shell, has drawn reports from large companies, including Amazon observations dating to October 17. Sophos retracted a claim of successful exploitation, and Google’s John Hultquist said his team has not validated in-the-wild exploitation. Researchers say circulating PoCs mostly work in lab conditions and stall on ASLR. Censys counted more than 41 million internet-facing PHP services on affected versions as of October 22. Experts still urge patching.
Unconfirmed: Successful exploitation is unconfirmed; Sophos retracted a success claim, and experts disagree on what reported attempts mean.
- Sophos later said it saw only a small number of failed attempts.
- Arctic Wolf linked attempts to Potassium; Cobalt tied some to Mirai.
- VulnCheck says it built an ASLR bypass not seen in public exploits.
- Hutchins reported a scanner finding reachable unpatched PHP systems.
- About 1 million services were running a fixed release, Censys said.
Impact: Attempted remote exploitation to install botnet malware
| Product | Affected |
|---|---|
| PHP | — |
- 1.Patch vulnerable PHP systems before a reliable exploit becomes available.
- Products
- PHP
Vulnerabilities mentioned
All| CVE | Vulnerability | CVSS | EPSS | Signals | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2026-109619+1 related CVE | Use-after-free RCE in PHP via stale request globals | 9.2 | 100% | PoC ×13 |
From the original article
3 min read at therecord.mediaThe headline-grabbing bugs known colloquially as PHP2Shell are giving cyber analysts a lot to track — and a lot to debunk.
therecord.media
A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.