Climbing the Hill: Prompt Injection Red-Teaming Against Frontier Models with Curriculum Reinforcement Learning
Curriculum RL red-teams frontier LLMs for prompt injection, hitting 93.8% ASR against GPT-5.6-Luna on AgentDyn.
Researchers propose curriculum reinforcement learning to red-team frontier LLMs for prompt injection, avoiding a cold start where every attempt scores zero reward. The attacker is trained on a sequence of increasingly robust targets and must partially succeed at each stage. On AgentDyn, the method reached ASR@10 of 93.8% against GPT-5.6-Luna and 45.0% against GPT-5.6-Terra, while RL-Hammer and PISmith scored 0%. An attacker trained on GPT-5.6-Terra also transferred to six other frontier models, including GPT-6-Luna; code is released as PIForge.
- Curriculum stages warm-start an attacker LLM against increasingly robust targets.
- ASR@10 reached 93.8% on GPT-5.6-Luna and 45.0% on GPT-5.6-Terra.
- RL-Hammer and PISmith scored 0% ASR on the same AgentDyn setting.
- An attacker trained on GPT-5.6-Terra transferred to six other frontier LLMs.
- Attacker code is released as PIForge.
Full article263 words · extracted from arxiv.org · click to collapse
Prompt injection is a leading security risk for LLMs and LLM-based applications such as agents. State-of-the-art red-teaming methods for prompt injection leverage reinforcement learning (RL) to train an attacker LLM to generate effective injected prompts. However, when targeting frontier LLMs such as GPT-6-Luna, a major challenge is the cold-start problem: every attack attempt by the attacker LLM fails and thus receives zero reward, providing no signal for learning. In this work, we propose a curriculum learning-based method to address the cold-start problem. In particular, we propose to train the attacker LLM against a sequence of increasingly robust target LLMs, with each stage warm-starting from the attacker LLM obtained in the previous one. However, simply training against a weak target (e.g., GPT-4o-mini) may not sufficiently prepare the attacker LLM to obtain useful learning signals against a frontier LLM (e.g., GPT-5.6-Terra). Instead, we find that the design of the curriculum is critical: after each stage, the attacker LLM needs to partially succeed against the next target LLM such that it can learn from successful attempts to attack the new target. Our extensive evaluation shows that our method can effectively red-team frontier LLMs, achieving an attack success rate (ASR@10) of 93.8\% and 45.0\% against GPT-5.6-Luna and GPT-5.6-Terra on AgentDyn, whereas state-of-the-art RL methods such as RL-Hammer and PISmith achieve 0\% ASR under the same setting. Moreover, we find that the attacker LLM transfers across targets, e.g., an attacker LLM trained to defeat one strong LLM (GPT-5.6-Terra) also succeeds against six other frontier LLMs (e.g., GPT-6-Luna) it was never trained on. Our code is available at \href{https://github.com/albert-y1n/PIForge}{here}.
Text extracted automatically; images, tables and formatting may be missing. Original: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.33628