Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Tight Query Lower Bounds for Quantum Sampling, with an Application to Certified Randomness

arXiv cs.CRby Keshav Bhateja ()1 min read1 · 1 read
AI summary · grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Tight quantum query bounds show high XEB scores certify near-ideal randomness from untrusted samplers.

The paper studies what a high linear cross-entropy benchmark (XEB) score certifies about an untrusted device in random circuit sampling. In the quantum query model, exceeding the honest sampler's ideal score by a constant requires Ω(N^{1/3}) queries for Haar and Fourier ensembles with N outcomes, and the bound is tight. A polynomial-query device scoring within o(1) of ideal retains n−O(log n) bits of smooth min-entropy even against an entangled adversary who later learns the oracle. Sampling the collision distribution has query complexity Θ(N^{1/3}).

Key facts
  • Beating the ideal XEB score by a constant needs Ω(N^{1/3}) queries.
  • The bound is tight for Haar-random states and Fourier sampling.
  • Near-ideal scores leave n−O(log n) bits of smooth min-entropy.
  • Collision-distribution sampling has query complexity Θ(N^{1/3}).
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Random circuit sampling experiments, the leading demonstrations of quantum computational advantage, are tested with the linear cross-entropy benchmark (XEB), which scores outcomes by their ideal probabilities. We study what a high XEB score certifies about an untrusted quantum device.

arXiv cs.CR

By Keshav Bhateja · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.CR

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.