Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

D-Link DIR-822A Router Vulnerability Scores CVSS 10.0 With Public PoC Available

GBHackersby Divya ()2 min read2 · 1 read
AI summary · glm-5.3Summaries by Vani AI

D-Link disclosed CVSS 10.0 unauthenticated stack buffer overflow in non-US DIR-822A routers with public PoC; no patch available yet.

D-Link advisory SAP10516 (published September 18, updated September 21) covers CVE-2026-86296, a stack-based buffer overflow in the udhcpcd component (serverpacket.c) of DIR-822A firmware A_101 caused by unsafe strcpy use, scored CVSS v3.1 and v4.0 at 10.0. A remote unauthenticated attacker with no user interaction could trigger memory corruption, and a public PoC exists. A second flaw, CVE-2026-86510 (CVSS 9.9), is an out-of-bounds write in the L2TP Control Message Parser's tunnel_set_params function requiring low privileges, also with a public PoC; both remain under investigation with no firmware fix released.

Key facts
  • CVE-2026-86296: CVSS 10.0 stack buffer overflow in DIR-822A udhcpcd, remotely exploitable without authentication
  • Public proof-of-concept exploit available for both disclosed flaws
  • Second flaw CVE-2026-86510 (CVSS 9.9) hits L2TP parser, needs low privileges
  • No patch yet; D-Link advises removing internet exposure and restricting remote management
Analyze CVE-2026-86296 with Vani AIImpact, affected versions, exploitation, mitigations and detection

Vulnerabilities mentioned

All
CVEVulnerabilityCVSSEPSSSignalsPublished
CVE-2026-86296
Stack-Based Buffer Overflow in D-Link DIR-822A udhcpcd DHCP Component
9.31%
CVE-2026-86510
Out-of-Bounds Write in D-Link DIR-822A L2TP Control Message Parser
8.6<1%

From the original article

2 min read at gbhackers.com

D-Link has announced a critical stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability affecting the non-US DIR-822A router, identified as CVE-2026-86296. This vulnerability has received a maximum CVSS v3. 1 score of 10.

GBHackers

By Divya · gbhackers.com

Read the full article at GBHackers

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.