Revolut Data Breach Via Fake Government Requests – What We Know So Far
Revolut confirmed attackers extracted customer KYC records by sending fraudulent data requests from a spoofed or compromised government agency email domain.
Revolut confirmed a data breach in which an unauthorized party obtained sensitive customer records by submitting fraudulent information requests from an email account on a legitimate government agency domain with valid SPF/DKIM/DMARC authentication. Disclosed data could include full names, dates of birth, passport or driving-license copies, onboarding facial images, IBANs, account statements, withdrawal records, and complete transaction histories including Bitcoin activity. Crypto investigator ZachXBT assessed the operation targeted high-net-worth users, while a threat actor using the name 'IAmNotAVillain' claimed Italian law-enforcement departments were compromised over six months with 147 GB of material, claims that remain unverified. Revolut says only a limited number of customers were affected, blocked the email address, and notified regulators and affected customers, stating its systems and funds were not compromised.
- Attacker used government-domain email with valid SPF/DKIM/DMARC to trigger data disclosure
- Disclosed KYC data includes IDs, selfies, IBANs, full transaction histories, Bitcoin activity
- ZachXBT says high-net-worth users targeted; actor claims 147 GB, six months
- Revolut says systems and funds unaffected; victim count and agency undisclosed
From the original article
4 min read at cybersecuritynews.com
British fintech Revolut has confirmed a data breach in which an unauthorized third party obtained sensitive customer records by submitting fraudulent information requests through an email address using a legitimate government agency’s domain. Unlike a conventional intrusion, the attacker did not have to exploit Revolut’s app or penetrate its core banking infrastructure. Instead, the operation […]
By Guru Baran · cybersecuritynews.com
A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.