Governing Bring Your Own AI: A Parameterized Maturity Model
Researchers propose a parameterized governance model and maturity ladder for Bring Your Own AI, finding data exposure and compliance dominate BYOAI risks.
The paper studies Bring Your Own AI (BYOAI), where employees use personal generative AI accounts such as ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude outside enterprise identity and security controls. Drawing on a curated corpus of 30 records (24 studies and 6 framework documents), the authors build a risk taxonomy, a five-level governance maturity ladder, and a parameterized model linking control-layer coverage to residual risk. Findings highlight data exposure and compliance as the most prominent risks, inconsistent framework engagement, and evidence that layered technical controls reduce modeled exfiltration risk more than prohibition-based approaches.
- BYOAI is employee-authenticated personal AI use outside enterprise identity and security controls
- Study analyzed 30 records, finding data exposure and compliance the top risk categories
- Five-level maturity ladder ties technical control coverage to residual risk outcomes
- Modeled results show layered controls cut exfiltration risk more than prohibition
Full article231 words · extracted from arxiv.org · click to collapse
Employees are increasingly using personally owned generative AI tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude for their daily work. This practice is known as Bring Your Own AI (BYOAI), which is a distinct form of Shadow AI in which employee-authenticated personal accounts are used outside of enterprise identity and security controls. Existing frameworks were designed for AI tools managed by organizations, and their coverage does not extend to unmanaged AI tools used with a personal account. In addressing these issues, we developed a governance model through a systematic review of the literature that produces a risk taxonomy and a framework-engagement profile. We also developed a parameterized governance model that measures how much a level of governance maturity reduces residual risk. A five-level maturity ladder is coupled to a technical control architecture through a chain in which the coverage of the control layer influences the security outcomes. Our study of a curated corpus of 30 records (24 research studies and 6 framework documents) indicated that the most prominent categories identified were data exposure and compliance, and framework engagement was inconsistent. Three mutually supporting pillars (technical, governance, and human) were established to support safeguards. Additionally, the results of the model demonstrated that prohibition-based solutions will result in residual risk levels close to those achieved through baseline solutions. Under the specified parameterization, layered control-based solutions substantially reduce modeled exfiltration risk and increase enforceable coverage.
Text extracted automatically; images, tables and formatting may be missing. Original: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.05236